Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Most U.S. States Poorly Prepared To Respond To Major Radiation Emergency Event

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:13 PM
Original message
Most U.S. States Poorly Prepared To Respond To Major Radiation Emergency Event
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/219208.php

A survey of state health departments finds substantial gaps in preparedness for response to a major radiation emergency event, according to a report posted online today by Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, a journal published by the American Medical Association. This article as well as all of the articles in the special issue, Nuclear Preparedness, is open access and can be viewed at Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness journal's website

"Attention on public health preparedness has increased since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York City's World Trade Center and other sites, " according to background information in the article. "In recent years, preparedness planning has expanded to an all-hazards approach that includes readiness to respond not only to terrorism but also to releases from unintentional technological incidents, natural disasters, and outbreaks of human diseases." Emergency preparedness guidance related to radiation release incidents (both intentional and unintentional) has come from a collaborative group of state, county, municipal and federal organizations called the National Alliance for Radiation Readiness (NARR). As part of the NARR activities, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) reassessed the status of radiation preparedness planning and response capabilities at the state health department level in 2010 through a survey. An original assessment was conducted in 2003.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. hardly a surprise
And with The American Taliban Party cutting funding for such things at the state level, they are unlikely to be anytime soon, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Most US States poorly prepared to respond to ... just about anything...
... thanks to all of the domestic infrastructure budgeting being sliced up between the military complex and bigass corporate tax breaks ...

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC