Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tepco's Damaged Reactors May Take 30 Years, $12 Billion to Scrap

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 05:17 AM
Original message
Tepco's Damaged Reactors May Take 30 Years, $12 Billion to Scrap
Tepco's Damaged Reactors May Take 30 Years, $12 Billion to Scrap
By Shigeru Sato, Yuji Okada and Tsuyoshi Inajima - Mar 30, 2011 12:20 AM ET

Damaged reactors at the crippled Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear plant may take three decades to decommission and cost operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. more than 1 trillion yen ($12 billion), engineers and analysts said.

Four of the plant’s six reactors became useless when sea water was used to cool them after the March 11 earthquake and tsunami knocked out generators running its cooling systems. The entire station north of Tokyo will likely be decommissioned, Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan said yesterday.

The damaged reactors need to be demolished after they have cooled and radioactive materials are removed and stored, said Tomoko Murakami, a nuclear researcher at the Institute of Energy Economics, Japan. The process will take longer than the 12 years needed to decommission the Three Mile Island reactor in Pennsylvania following a partial meltdown, said Hironobu Unesaki, a nuclear engineering professor at Kyoto University.

“Lack of public support may force the decommissioning of all six reactors,” said Daniel Aldrich, a political science professor at Purdue University in Indiana. Tepco “will try to salvage two if it can find public support, which may be unlikely.” ...


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-30/tokyo-electric-s-damaged-reactors-may-take-30-years-12-billion-to-scrap.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Scrapping them no matter what the cost is a good investment IMO. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. If they are saying 12 billion now, the final cost will be double or tripple. That's the way
the numbers always work out in the nuclear power industry.

But yes, the have to do it, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComtesseDeSpair Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Perfect example of why the nuclear industry cannot be trusted...
Just the fact that they would even CONSIDER continuing to utilize two nuclear reactors near the ocean in a country prone to earthquakes and tsunamis, after a disaster has already befallen other reactors at the same plant, tells you all you ever need to know about the nuclear power industry. I love to point things like this out to Libertarian types who think that industry can regulate itself. As if.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. How will the workers get to it if there's a exclusion zone anyway?
They are still in denial, their nuclear train is off the tracks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. "exclusion zone" means different things to different people
How large was the exclusion zone for Chernobyl?

Yet people worked at the other reactors on the site for a number of years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Boggles the mind, doesn't it? -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abqmufc Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. And in 10 - 15 years most homes will have toasters made out of TEPCO scrap metal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC