Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NHK—Radiation detected in beef, vegetables

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 05:28 PM
Original message
NHK—Radiation detected in beef, vegetables
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/01_05.html

Radiation detected in beef, vegetables

Radiation exceeding safety standards has been detected in beef from Fukushima and vegetables from Ibaraki, Tochigi and Chiba prefectures.

The health ministry says it detected 510 becquerels per kilogram of radioactive cesium, above than the national limit of 500, in round beef from a cow raised in a village in Fukushima prefecture on Wednesday. The beef has not been shipped.

In Hitachi city, Ibaraki prefecture, 8,300 becquerels, or 4 times above the accepted limit, of radioactive iodine was detected in spinach. Spinach and parsley from other parts of Ibaraki were also found to be contaminated with higher-than-acceptable levels of radiation.

Spinach, shungiku, or garland chrysanthemum, and parsley with radiation exceeding acceptable levels were found in Chiba prefecture.



Friday, April 01, 2011 05:09 +0900 (JST)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hitachi City is Almost 100 Miles South of the Plant
more than halfway to Tokyo, and the prevailing winds should have blown most of the fallout the other way.

This must be a lot worse than they have been saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The fallout won't be uniform
You'll get some hot spots at large distances. I've watched some of the simulations and while the prevailing winds do mostly blow things out to sea there are some days when the projected plume has been a bit to the southwest.

There are probably some places fairly close that are not badly contaminated and some small areas quite far that have a high concentration of contamination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. and if it keeps spewing radiation for months or years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It hasn't been "spewing" for some time.
It's leaking a great deal... but not "spewing".

Even around the plant itself, the radiation levels in the air have fallen significantly... and there isn't much chance of many significant steam releases now that the cores are at a couple tenths of a percent of full power.

The ongoing radiation hazard is mostly in the cleanup and the leaking cooling water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Then Why are Iodine 131 Levels So High?
Iodine 131 has a fairly short half-life. There shouldn't be so much of it around by now,
yet levels are still quite high. Where is it coming from?
Things aren't quite as "shut down" as they're supposed to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. They aren't in most cases
Edited on Thu Mar-31-11 11:33 PM by FBaggins
Iodine's half life is around eight days, so there should be about 1/4th as much of the stuff as on day1, but there were multiple days of deposition. So in general (with wild variability) you should expect a few days of rising levels followed by a gentle decline. This is muddled by the fact that weather patterns haven't been constant (nor were releases), so there's tons of variability... and the farther away from the source you go, the longer the delay in the curve.

Things get a little more complicated when we're talking about the ocean though... since that leak is continuing. The Iodine levels in the core may by 1/4th of what they were on day 1... but that's still allows for MUCH higher concentrations in water that's leaking out. Levels influenced by that leakage may continue to go up for some time unless they can identify and manage the leak.

It isn't safe to pick a single spot to watch and say "this is what radiation levels are doing", because we just don't know where the "plume" was on any given day and how that compared to the timing of various releases... but take a look at Tokyo's water supply. Radioiodine levels there are down to about 1/4 of where they were at the peak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC