|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 09:07 AM Original message |
Arnie Gunderson Refutes TEPCO's imagination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
1. It's time for the pro-nuke people to take a hard look at their own humanity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 10:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Time for antinukes to acknowledge their ignorant, irrational fear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intaglio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 10:34 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Would you like to withdraw that unexplained slander? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 10:41 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Actually, we have the opposite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intaglio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 01:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Nuclear power generation was driven by the military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 01:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Oh, absolutely, critical for plutonium production in the past. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 04:54 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. MOX is history after this disaster, No. 3 reactor might still blow more Pu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 04:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. MOX is still being happily digested in two reactors in Japan alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 06:03 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. There is plenty of information about the dangers of MOX, explosion much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 06:18 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. It is not a mystery why it exploded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 06:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. What were the CO2e emissions of that *entire* fuel cycle? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 06:36 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. A lot more than zero. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 06:48 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Whether it is "sunk cost" depends on the system that is being used and created. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 07:02 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Phasing it out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 04:00 AM Response to Reply #6 |
24. Would you care to look at the post to which he was replying? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 11:09 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. The word 'Fukushima' means 'ignorant irrational anti-nuke fear' so does 'Chernobyl' in Ukrainan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 10:38 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Nope, I'm human, and I sleep just fine at night. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 11:02 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. It's not safe, don't forget waste, and the industry is irresponsible and we pay for that nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 11:20 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Of course we pay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 11:59 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. "increasing safety measures" means turning them off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 12:25 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. According to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
godai (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
2. I watched the video. Found it encouraging. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 09:59 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. They admitted it's too hot to work around the reactors and robots can't do major construction nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-19-11 10:01 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Yep, #2 has a hole in it's suppression pool, based on reports going back as far as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC