Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reactor 1 water level concerns

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 07:32 AM
Original message
Reactor 1 water level concerns


The Japanese government has expressed concern about the structural strength of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant's Number 1 reactor. It says the ongoing water injections may be making the vessel less earthquake resistant. Tokyo Electric Power Company, or TEPCO, is planning to fill part of the containment vessel with water to cool the reactor.

TEPCO wants the water level to reach the top of the fuel rods in reactors one and three by mid July, so it can cool them under more stable conditions. At the Number 1 reactor, where fuel rods are believed to be the most seriously damaged, six tons of water are being injected every hour.

TEPCO believes the water is vaporizing, then condensing in the containment vessel. The water level is now estimated to be about half way up the bulb of the dry well. TEPCO says the water accumulation will not compromise the structure. But the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency says large amounts of water can make the building less earthquake-proof. The agency says it needs to check whether the suppression pool pipes can withstand higher levels of pressure from the extra water.

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/23_05.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's an important point to consider.
It's one thing for a structure to survive an earthquake, but what about the next shaker?

And what if the structure can't be walked away from...like a, er, steaming pile of nuclear crap?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldingrockwarlord2 Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. steaming nuclear pile is right
They'll be poaring water on this puppy probably for years. I'm already mind numb from each report because it's reactor 1, no wait, it's 3, no, 4, no which one is it today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC