|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Saboburns (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 08:51 PM Original message |
er, um. How come nobody has died, or even gotten sick?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLoner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. OK, my hubby is an expert on this stuff, says that it's been classified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DisgustipatedinCA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. where did you read this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saboburns (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. You're kidding right?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DisgustipatedinCA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Yes, I've seen a lot of comparisons like that. However, that's not what I asked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sonoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Nice, DCA... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DisgustipatedinCA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. No argument from me. We're all going to die |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saboburns (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I'm not pushing anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DisgustipatedinCA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 10:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. thanks for your reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 06:36 AM Response to Reply #12 |
34. The reason you're not getting that information is because the nuke boys aren't putting it out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 07:26 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Facts that are inconvenient for your position... are nevertheless facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. The comparison to Chernobyl implies immediate deaths |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 12:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
47. So it is not a L-7 accident... I see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 12:17 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. If this were 100 times worse than Chernobyl... it would still be an L-7 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 06:19 AM Response to Reply #48 |
66. Yet again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. I'm pretty sure that if you are not killed almost immediately from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. Here's another good explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 05:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
30. geez caldicot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 06:32 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Looks like all you first year chemists are doing a great job so far at Fukushima |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 08:21 AM Response to Reply #33 |
39. obviously, another person with no science background |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 06:22 PM Response to Reply #39 |
55. Obviously, another person in the nuclear energy (i.e. certain death) industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 08:06 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Dude give it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 08:47 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. So I'm supposed to believe some anonymous DU member and ignore this guy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 11:10 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. You are not suppose to believe ANYONE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 06:25 AM Response to Reply #63 |
67. Including YOU, Wikileaks, and the Periodic Table? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 11:59 AM Response to Reply #67 |
92. My name is Confusious, PHD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 11:17 PM Response to Reply #67 |
103. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 07:21 AM Response to Reply #63 |
71. List of elements by stability of isotopes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:30 AM Response to Reply #71 |
76. Different isotopes are not different elements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 12:12 PM Response to Reply #71 |
94. Any respectable scientist would use the correct term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 12:01 PM Response to Reply #58 |
93. Busby... oh brother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 07:38 AM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Here's another first year chemist on Fukushima |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 08:22 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. No, i saw caldicot and knew it was bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 04:22 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. Because failing to respond to bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 05:36 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. yep. and that is what I was doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 06:17 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Yet you fail to respond to the learned opinions of the doctor and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #54 |
90. Learned? would they be like caldicott? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 09:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
119. Sounds like something Caldicott would say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:47 PM Response to Reply #119 |
127. Are you asserting that you are fairly and honestly characterizing Caldicott's statement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:31 PM Response to Reply #127 |
129. YES!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:43 PM Response to Reply #129 |
131. What about the part that follows where she says "if adequately distributed"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:51 PM Response to Reply #131 |
133. I gave you a VERBATIM QUOTE !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 06:17 PM Response to Reply #133 |
136. Let's look at the written record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:08 PM Response to Reply #136 |
139. Since when is a verbatim quote an "attack" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:24 PM Response to Reply #139 |
141. When it's inconvenient to kris' position of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:36 PM Response to Reply #141 |
156. Kris suffers from "situational accuracy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:25 PM Response to Reply #139 |
142. If the message of the one pound example were related to distribution you might have a point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:28 PM Response to Reply #142 |
143. So lying is ok as long as your heart is in the right place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:32 PM Response to Reply #143 |
144. She isn't lying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:46 PM Response to Reply #144 |
146. She's either lying of ignorant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:51 PM Response to Reply #146 |
148. FBaggins - here I have to disagree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:47 PM Response to Reply #142 |
147. If that's the meaning - then explain why we are all not dead!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:12 PM Response to Reply #147 |
151. Her words are clear, I don't need to interpret them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #151 |
154. Clear - clear as mud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:44 PM Response to Reply #154 |
161. Typcial attempt to dishonestly divert the discussion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:07 PM Response to Reply #161 |
165. That's not what I say; or any real nuclear professionals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:37 PM Response to Reply #151 |
158. Yes... It's clear. And clearly wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:45 PM Response to Reply #158 |
162. Then you would be ok with it embedded in your lungs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 05:04 AM Response to Reply #162 |
170. Par for your course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 10:31 PM Response to Reply #162 |
172. Uh-oh, here come some pesky facts that anti-nuclear-power nuts don't want you to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 08:28 AM Response to Reply #4 |
41. Here's another of caldicotts greatest hits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 06:28 AM Response to Reply #41 |
68. uh, exponential? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 11:55 AM Response to Reply #68 |
91. She never said whether it was either linear or exponential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-29-11 10:37 AM Response to Reply #91 |
120. Yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #68 |
130. There's no reason for it to be exponential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 05:44 AM Response to Reply #130 |
173. As usual, you really miss the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 09:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
43. When I want an expert's take on radiation I always turn to pediatricians. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 09:28 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Yeah... because those health physicists are idiots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 09:59 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. "Physicist", "Physician"...I think they're pretty much the same thing. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. Just how quickly do you think cancer kills people? There are thousands of walking dead, right now, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLoner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. But again apparently the classification is not based on how many will die or get sick, it's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saboburns (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. I agree with you that there are many walking wounded as of today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLoner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I've been sick and haven't followed this issue as closely as I should have but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 10:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
24. Radiation can kill in a few weeks or even less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 11:03 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. No. It's not sensible. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 12:02 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Why not? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 06:30 AM Response to Reply #5 |
32. Not just "kills in hours"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
8. Sorry that no one dead yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
13. LOL. Nuclear industry shilling FAIL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:51 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Yup we're all shills for the nuke industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 10:22 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. What? You get a check? All I get is a small baggy of radioactive material... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saboburns (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 10:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Sad we can't have a semi rational, calm discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 09:10 AM Response to Reply #21 |
42. Rational thought goes out the window when it comes to nuclear power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 09:30 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Some people are afraid to fly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
16. i could be dead because of all the above ground atomic bomb testing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caraher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
19. False premise... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. OK. That's 2 workers who got burns on their legs, not fatalities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saboburns (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 10:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Actually I did read about those burned workers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 05:10 AM Response to Reply #19 |
28. I whole heartly agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 08:17 AM Response to Reply #28 |
38. Your post is equally true if you substitute "coal" for "nuclear" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Someguyinjapan (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 05:19 AM Response to Original message |
29. The answer is simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 06:02 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Not that fast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Someguyinjapan (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 07:51 AM Response to Reply #31 |
37. You sensed correctly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
50. I love how the pro-nukesters avoid discussing the radioactive water getting into the ocean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 05:13 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. I love how your imagined reality makes you think anyone "avoided" it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 05:37 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. The cesium in fish hundreds of miles away is killing their fish industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 09:01 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. That's strange... I must have missed that report. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 11:23 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. This is what I found not spending much time cesium in fish in Iabaraki |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:18 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Perhaps you should have spent a little more time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 07:43 AM Response to Reply #65 |
72. The tsunami is over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:51 AM Response to Reply #72 |
78. The damage to Japan's fishing industry from the tsunami is NOT over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:04 PM Response to Reply #78 |
96. Now you're just being obtuse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:26 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. We're discussing the Japanese fishing industry. Do try to pay attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:29 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. Boats can be rebuilt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:33 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. What I "get" is that you don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:40 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Oh, thanks, I get it now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-29-11 10:44 AM Response to Reply #100 |
121. Citation required |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-29-11 11:06 AM Response to Reply #121 |
123. Yes... and yours is lacking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 06:07 PM Response to Reply #123 |
135. Please see recent reports that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:14 PM Response to Reply #135 |
140. You always seem to apply a great deal of imagination to what you read. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
57. half the fuel still exposed.. and your pulling this thread stunt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 08:51 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. "Exposed"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 07:48 AM Response to Reply #59 |
73. You know very well that the spent fuel rods are EXPOSED to the atmosphere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:56 AM Response to Reply #73 |
79. Actually no... I don't know that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:03 AM Response to Reply #59 |
75. Something I just saw on the DU home page: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:58 AM Response to Reply #75 |
80. Strangely missing from that report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 10:19 AM Response to Reply #80 |
84. Here is something that's strangely PRESENT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 10:24 AM Response to Reply #84 |
85. So you admit that you don't read what you reply to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:01 PM Response to Reply #85 |
95. You can believe whatever you like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 10:27 AM Response to Reply #84 |
112. Keep counting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 06:39 AM Response to Reply #57 |
69. Come on, we're supposed to believe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
61. This is just flame bait. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-26-11 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
62. Fukushima is going to be a human tragedy, there is no doubt about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 06:43 AM Response to Reply #62 |
70. way off base as per usual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 10:02 AM Response to Reply #70 |
82. So rational -- hundreds of scare mongering posts while there are still thousands dead and missing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 10:26 AM Response to Reply #70 |
86. + 1000 shit sandwich with cesium seasoning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 07:53 AM Response to Reply #62 |
74. As many as 1.4 million people died due to Chernobyl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:42 AM Response to Reply #74 |
77. As few as 60 died due to Chernobyl. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 09:20 AM Response to Reply #77 |
81. Pro-nukes continue to downplay Chornobyl... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 10:29 AM Response to Reply #81 |
87. Agree that some here are unable to absorb the facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:11 PM Response to Reply #77 |
97. If you're serious about your statement that "this is fun" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 06:29 PM Response to Reply #97 |
102. Aww. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 06:53 AM Response to Reply #102 |
104. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 10:11 AM Response to Reply #104 |
109. Greenpeace founder: I was wrong about nuclear power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 11:43 AM Response to Reply #109 |
115. Moore is a paid spokeman for the fission industry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 10:12 AM Response to Reply #74 |
83. I share your concern about radiation, and deaths due to power plants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 10:30 AM Response to Reply #83 |
88. Your argument is from the past and all pro-nukers use it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 10:50 AM Response to Reply #88 |
89. You've got your wires crossed there flamer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 06:58 AM Response to Reply #89 |
105. Stop using coal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 07:15 AM Response to Reply #105 |
106. Are you a global climate change denier? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 08:29 AM Response to Reply #106 |
107. We're past the point of no return on climate change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 10:23 AM Response to Reply #107 |
111. Mother Earth would recover a lot faster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 08:30 AM Response to Reply #106 |
108. BTW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 10:15 AM Response to Reply #108 |
110. I don't know what you've been reading or listening to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 11:37 AM Response to Reply #110 |
113. I'm so ignorant of nuclear physics and technology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 11:41 AM Response to Reply #113 |
114. Why hasn't Chernobyl wiped out life as we know it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 03:19 PM Response to Reply #114 |
116. Have you heard of the exclusion zone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 03:40 PM Response to Reply #116 |
118. Funny you mention, I live in one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:26 PM Response to Reply #118 |
126. The Santa Susana accident is familiar to scientists in the field... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:19 PM Response to Reply #116 |
125. Yes - and they only exclude people.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:02 PM Response to Reply #125 |
134. Selective cherry picking statistics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 07:33 AM Response to Reply #116 |
171. Welcome to DU, nonperson! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-03-11 09:26 AM Response to Reply #171 |
181. Thanks for posting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:10 PM Response to Reply #113 |
124. You prove it in your own words.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:17 PM Response to Reply #124 |
128. No, that is what a POLLUTING INDUSTRY claims France is doing with their waste |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:46 PM Response to Reply #128 |
132. Whatever.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 06:35 PM Response to Reply #132 |
137. You cited France. Nothing to do with weapons, French recyling is a hidden ecological nightmare. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 08:49 PM Response to Reply #137 |
138. FORGET IT! I don't want any chances to discuss anything with you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:35 PM Response to Reply #138 |
145. You made yet another false claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:56 PM Response to Reply #145 |
149. I'm not having a tantrum. I just don't want to discuss BS with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:18 PM Response to Reply #149 |
153. If you don't want to discuss BS then stop spouting it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:30 PM Response to Reply #153 |
155. YOU are the one spouting the BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:36 PM Response to Reply #155 |
157. The International Panel on Fissile Materials shows you are making false claims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:41 PM Response to Reply #157 |
160. This is why it is hard to discuss - no specifics - just generalities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:51 PM Response to Reply #160 |
163. You made a specific set of claims that were false. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:13 PM Response to Reply #163 |
166. But you can't NAME one!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 06:08 AM Response to Reply #155 |
174. Bah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 07:28 AM Response to Reply #174 |
175. But "Bah" is a valid argument? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 11:53 AM Response to Reply #175 |
176. Man you just don't know when to quit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 12:39 PM Response to Reply #176 |
177. Lol! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:46 PM Response to Reply #176 |
178. You jumped in to a discussion but your posts have zero content |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 05:48 PM Response to Reply #178 |
179. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt when it comes to understanding... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txlibdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 06:55 PM Response to Reply #179 |
180. Yet another post with zero data, zero factual basis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:10 PM Response to Reply #128 |
150. OK - I'll address the specifics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:16 PM Response to Reply #150 |
152. You are again resorting to a hypothetical that is contradicted by reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:57 PM Response to Reply #152 |
164. FORGET France and FORGET the IPFM - deal with the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:41 PM Response to Reply #164 |
167. In the real world of multipolar power structures and profit motives it is a pipe dream. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:51 PM Response to Reply #167 |
168. I knew it.. I knew it...I knew it... I KNEW IT!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-01-11 12:06 AM Response to Reply #168 |
169. You knew that your claim was false when you made it, you mean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-29-11 10:51 AM Response to Reply #83 |
122. What you seem to fail to grasp is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
117. The pro-nuke industry is beginning to remind me of the tobacco industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
159. Cover. Up. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC