Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Charts Showing Release of Radioactive Iodine and Cesium into Air May Be Going Up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 09:57 AM
Original message
Charts Showing Release of Radioactive Iodine and Cesium into Air May Be Going Up
http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/

#Fukushima I Nuke Plant: Charts Showing Release of Radioactive Iodine and Cesium into Air May Be Going Up Again

Found them @Physics Forums, posted by clancy688 today. The poster doesn't link to the original site where the charts came from. Labels are in German, so they could be from DWD (Deutscher Wetterdienst), as CTBTO does not have a mandate to disclose the data.

CTBTO stands for "Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization", and "38" is their Takasaki Station in Gunma Prefecture in Japan.

It looks as if something had happened around April 18, and both cesium 137 and iodine-131 are on the rise again in a volatile fashion in Japan. The US West Coast is following suit. MORE AT LINK


I do not know and do not guarantee the authenticity of the charts.

Unit is becquerels in cubic meter, and the red dotted line indicates the highest daily amount in Germany (May 1, 1986 in Bavarian Forest) during the Chernobyl accident.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. I too wonder whether the source is accurate... but that does NOT show it going up.
Edited on Wed Apr-27-11 10:09 AM by FBaggins
Both graphs show some "noise", but the overall picture is clearly one of declining levels.

When you consider that it's a logarithmic scale, it's a pretty strong decline.

You should expect the "noise" to be much more significant for the pink line because there's far more variability when you get close to the source. It's probably accounted for by weather patterns and (guessing) multiple sites. As you might imagine, you wouldn't expect much difference between New York and Washington when the source is thousands of miles away, but just tens of miles would make a big difference in Japan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC