Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Radiation levels tail off in tests of milk and air (Hawaii)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:32 AM
Original message
Radiation levels tail off in tests of milk and air (Hawaii)
Radiation levels in Hawaii from Japan’s nuclear crisis continue to fall, government monitoring shows. Milk tested at a dairy in Hilo on April 4 registered 24 picocuries per liter for cesium-134, 19 picocuries for cesium-137 and 18 picocuries for iodine-131, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Milk samples tested again on April 13 — the most recent data — showed 11 picocuries for cesium-134, 11 picocuries for cesium-137 and a “non-detect” level for iodine-131.

At either level the radiation posed no public health risk, state officials have said. “We considered it safe before, and I can’t even say it’s safer now, because we were safe to begin with,” said Jeff Eckerd, acting program manager of the state Health Department’s indoor and radiological health branch. “The numbers are coming down, so we’re good.”

Air monitoring on Kauai April 1-3 and on Oahu April 1-4 recorded non-detect levels for all isotopes tested. Honolulu rainwater was found to have 2.2 picocuries per liter for iodine-131 on April 7.
...snip...

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s “derived intervention level” — the point at which steps would be taken to safeguard the public — is 33,000 picocuries for the combined cesium isotopes and 4,700 picocuries for iodine-131. At those levels the sale of affected milk could be stopped. A separate standard is the EPA’s “maximum contaminant level” for radiation in water at 3 picocuries per liter. But that presumes a 70-year consumption of two liters a day with that level of radiation.

http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/hawaiinews/20110427_Radiation_levels_tail_off_in_tests_of_milk_and_air.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if anyone's going to come out and eat a little crow for all the doomsday predictions.
I know, ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Of course you're right
It's ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Have we died yet?
It's the only hope to justify all that angst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not a whiff of this on media slut Arnie Gundersen's website
Must be an oversight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. In fairness, he's concerned with the reactors themselves
which still have the potential for massive releases of radioactive material.

He's not really talking about downwind fallout issues. The 'leak' at Fukushima has been decreasing steadily, accordig to local monitoring, so this all makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. True. However, Gunderson did release a video in which he interviewed a toxicologist...
... who declared that every atom of radioactivity is potentially lethal. It was the most irresponsible thing I have ever seen on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Actually... in fairness that's not quite true.
You're correct that it "all makes sense"... but think about why the levels are dropping. Those "whys" directly refute what he has claimed is going on inside the reactors/pools. Iodine levels are falling rapidly because of the short half-life combined with declining production... but this wouldn't be the case with recriticality (as just one example).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. If I drank that much milk I'd die...

...from gas.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nilram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. +10 for the pic!
I can see milk doesn't agree with you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. And of course, here come people to blindly unrec actual science on the subject.
Can't let anyone know that the predictions of nuclear apocalypse were full of shit, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. They don't want it to be true.
They would prefer that others live with a health risk as long as their debate position isn't harmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. +1 (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC