Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A U.N. Treaty on the Human Right to Water?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 07:57 PM
Original message
A U.N. Treaty on the Human Right to Water?
Thalif Deen

UNITED NATIONS, Sep 7 (IPS) - The United Nations has warned that by 2025, about 1.8 billion people will live in countries or regions with absolute water scarcity.

If that's the gloomy scenario, says Kathryn Mulvey, executive director of Corporate Accountability International, then the upcoming U.N. Millennium Summit should explore the potential for an international treaty to protect the human right to water. <snip>

She said that water should be freely available as a human right but it is becoming increasingly scarce because big business is stepping in and turning water into a profit-driven industry, inflating the price of water beyond the reach of those who need it most.

The summit, which is to be attended by over 170 world leaders and scheduled to take place Sep. 14-16, is expected to review the progress made in relation to the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) set by the U.N. General Assembly back in September 2000. The deadline to reach the goals is 2015. <snip>

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=30171

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dcfirefighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. capitalism & the free market
work great for reproduceable things, not so well for nature's wealth.
The error is in treating natural wealth like capital.

I am all for the state ownership of water - currently in the constitutions of several states.

Water rights aught to be periodically auctioned, with the proceeds going to the state as representative of the people. Can't have a monopoly this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC