Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China’s Nuclear Scientists Unveil Latest ‘Breakthrough’ (fast breeder minireactors)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:15 AM
Original message
China’s Nuclear Scientists Unveil Latest ‘Breakthrough’ (fast breeder minireactors)
China’s Nuclear Scientists Unveil Latest ‘Breakthrough’

China says its nuclear industry has made a fresh technological breakthrough, which, even if it doesn’t immediately solve the country’s energy needs, underscores Beijing’s determination to be a leading font of knowledge about the controversial power source.

The China Institute of Atomic Energy said Thursday that a small, experimental “fast breeder” reactor outside Beijing had been hooked to the grid to produce electricity. Essentially, the tiny 20 megawatt nuclear plant “863” is now helping satisfy China’s vast power needs.

...Yet the process hasn’t proved workable on a large scale elsewhere. Fast-breeder programs have been abandoned in a number of countries, including the U.S., and the plants that remain are small. To some critics, it is a nuclear version of the “perpetual motion machine,” a seemingly problem-solving theory that doesn’t work well outside the laboratory.

...Among the practical challenges associated with fast-breeders: they are potentially riskier than more conventional light-water reactors, relying on cooling of the reactor core with a potentially dangerous loop of flammable sodium, rather than water. Plus, the fuel input is essentially weapons-grade uranium, which is difficult to handle compared with the chemically stable material that powers most nuclear plants, namely uranium dioxide...


http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2011/07/21/china’s-nuclear-scientists-unveil-latest-breakthrough/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. "they are potentially riskier". Exactly what we don't need!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. We don't need one more nuclear power plant anywhere in the world
In fact the 440 some odd, we have worldwide should be shut down before nature fucks them up. Its obvious that the industry doesn't have a clue as to what is the best way to deal with a catastrophe when one does happen and they are going to happen. Shut 'm down and do it now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. .
Make power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
SpoonFed Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Buhbuhblahbluhblah!?!!@#
Edited on Sun Jul-24-11 09:17 PM by SpoonFed
And it was impossible for someplace like Fukushima to go all Nukushima, too.
It'll just be time before one of these new Chinese toys goes pop-squirt and that'll be that.
The lithium oxidation phase of the future catastrophe will be particularly cool, looking, provided I'm a million miles away.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpoonFed Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I also particularly like the fantasyland portion of the quote...
Edited on Sun Jul-24-11 09:28 PM by SpoonFed
where to paraphrase, "lithium only burns in the presense of oxygen... like everything else."
Right... like all the other metals that we commonly use to build stuff out of... that normally spontaneously combust in presense of oxygen.
You just put that in there for your detractors' amusement, didn't you?

not only will they have to build a huge clown tent over the future Chinese Nukushima,
the tent will have to be filled with pure nitrogen?

uh-huh

and this pure nitrogen tent better be able to withstand any magnitude earthquake or tsunami or natural or man-made disaster.
Can you not appreciate how rubegoldbergesque and ridiculous this all is?

you do know that impossible coming from the nuke industry and it's pundits is equal to probable, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC