Dear skeptics: Here is more climate data than you can handle

[n2doc]

BY SARAH LASKOW
29 JUL 2011 11:33 AM
For the climate skeptics who dragged us all through Climategate on the conviction that climate scientists are lying jerks, here is the data you wanted to see. Here it is. The University of East Anglia put it online for all to access. This might make it harder for scientists to get shared data in the future, since people don’t always like it when you give away their work for free, but it is worth it just to shut you up.

Happy now? Oh, what, you actually have no idea how to interpret this raw data?

more

http://www.grist.org/list/2011-07-29-dear-skeptics-here-is-more-climate-data-than-you-can-handle

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20739-ok-climate-sceptics-heres-the-raw-data-you-wanted.html

[fascisthunter]

1. There is no debate anymore... the deniers are liars, and fools

with shit for brains.

[GliderGuider]

2. I couldn't agree more! nt

[stuntcat]

4. also pure Evil

with a capital E.

IMO the most cosmically evil thing our species can do is drive so many others to extinction and waste an entire planet. Any human who's ever EVER fought against environmentalists is so cosmically Evil.

I'm a strong atheist but that kind of evil, actively fighting against the world and against their own spawn's future, gives me a sick fear, it is so dirty. Makes me think we're more than just a natural disaster.

[GliderGuider]

5. +1

I agree completely. If there is evil in the world, this is an prime example.

[napoleon_in_rags]

3. It doesn't take a weatherman...

Seriously, this summer it just seems to me like the weather is weird, and there have been a load of extreme weather events. I know that the media can make certain things look bigger, like the falling birds crisis (which apparently is not that rare, just rarely reported) but this has gone beyond that threshold for me. It doesn't take a lot of hard data to convince me.

[kestrel91316]

6. I need a new keyboard after THIS:

"....Pro tip for skeptics: A peer-reviewed journal is probably not going to publish a paper that’s just “what about the moon volcanoes??” written in crayon...."