Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Repub plan to deal with hurricanes- eliminate Fed. conservation programs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 04:01 PM
Original message
Repub plan to deal with hurricanes- eliminate Fed. conservation programs
Republican Study Committee Calls to Drop Energy Star Program
September 30, 2005

Washington, DC In the wake of both hurricanes Katrina and Rita the Federal government's ability to help pay for reconstruction is likely to involve some fiscal belt-tightening. Barring any change in tax policy, this could spell the end of the popular Energy Star program and a separate renewable energy research program if influential forces in the capitol have their way.

On September 21, the Republican Study Committee released a 23-page report called "Operation Offset" that outlined its recommended "Budget Options 2005." Among its recommendations are deep cuts in a number of energy and environmental programs.

First and foremost, the study calls for the elimination of the federal Energy Star Program, which encourages consumers and organizations to produce and purchase energy saving items for their home or business with its label and certification. For example, if a company's products meet a certain and often stringent energy efficiency standard, they can place the Energy Star label on their product.

The report argues that, "some contend the program does not actually yield any energy savings, and that the labels are too vague to share any educational information with the consumer."

According to the report, elimination of the Energy Star Program will save $835 million over ten years ($391 million over five years). Representatives of the Energy Star Program could not be contacted for comment.

The Republican Study Committee report also called for the elimination of the Applied Research for Renewable Energy Sources program, which funds research and development of renewable sources of energy, including developing alternative liquid fuels from biomass.

The study said such research is already subsidized through the tax code and that "...development of applied energy technology is not necessarily a proper role for the federal government."

This would save the federal government $4.2 billion over ten years ($2 billion over five years).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like propaganda from the WSJ or the Cato Institute
ground up and turned into gop policy. (I know it's old, but do you still have the link?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Linkie....
Straight from the horse's ass...the Republican Study Committee (is that an oxymoron?)

(PDF)
http://johnshadegg.house.gov/rsc/RSC_Budget_Options_2005.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. thanks!
Edited on Fri Oct-14-05 11:49 AM by TheBorealAvenger
Search for "Israel" in the document (control-f). You won't find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC