Not that I expect you to get it, but the system - owned by a rich
corporation looking for PR is going to save 7000 tons of CO2
over the next 30 years.In the continuing solar fraud, they always speak about what they're going to do in 30 years, but I'll bet this tiny little thing, also rated in fraud "peak" watts, not in physicist watts, will be abandoned well before 30 years passed, when a part wears out, a gear breaks, a motor shorts out, and they can't find the part. Then it will be dismantled, although there will, sadly, be no breathless press release announcing its removal.
Maybe it will end up like the baby pictured in this link, which was once the largest solar plant in the world:
http://ludb.clui.org/ex/i/CA4965/Notice the rust. This solar plant didn't run 30 years. It ran 11 years, and they dug up the landscape to remove it. I'll bet that the heavy equipment digging those big holes - putting it in and then pulling it out - burned quite a bit of diesel fuel - not biodiesel I'd guess. I'll bet it's even more impressive if you consider that this is a
remote site.
What is really telling about this New Jersey Johnson and Johnson thing is that a 505 kilo"watt" facility merits a press release as the "largest of East of the Mississippi." Pathetic isn't it? There are small companies that have back up generators larger than that. Imagine that, decades and decades and decades of talk and then some talk and then some more talk about the solar wonderland, and what do we have to show for it? The ability to eliminate 233 tons of carbon dioxide per year!
That won't even cover the cow farts in New Jersey, and we're not particularly well known as a dairy state.
But look, 233 tons is 233 tons. If Johnson and Johnson has money to burn on this, it's better for the environment for some of the other PR they might do, assuming that too many people don't
drive up to Skillman to chant at the Temple of the Sun God while drinking of the Sunlight sacrament.
The Johnson and Johnson Titusville facility is a short bike ride from here by the way. If I were credulous - and I'm not - I could see it any time I want. I can assure you that this ride, a couple of kilometers down wooded roads, would not involve seeing any other PV systems here.
I'm certainly not going to waste gas riding up to Skillman to marvel at the new one. Since it's practical effect on global climate change is already tiny, we really don't want to put it in the area of negative effect on carbon dioxide output by me burning 5 gallons of gas to go see it. Let's just pretend I saw it and let's pretend that I was duly impressed.