Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Greenpeace Uncovers U.S. Plot to Kill Kyoto

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 03:21 AM
Original message
Greenpeace Uncovers U.S. Plot to Kill Kyoto
Greenpeace Uncovers U.S. Plot to Kill Kyoto
December 11, 2005

Lobbyists funded by the US oil industry have launched a campaign in Europe aimed at derailing efforts to tackle greenhouse gas pollution and climate change. The lobbyist involved with this campaign is Chris Horner, who is a Washington DC lawyer and a senior fellow at the rightwing thinktank, the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

Some Documents recently obtained by Greenpeace and seen by the Guardian UK reveal a plot to “persuade European business, politicians and the media that the EU should abandon its commitments under the Kyoto protocol, the international agreement that aims to reduce emissions that lead to global warming. ”

The disclosure comes as United Nations climate change talks in Montreal on the future of Kyoto, the first phase of which expires in 2012, enter a critical phase.

The documents, an email and a PowerPoint presentation, describe efforts to establish a European coalition to “challenge the course of the EU’s post-2012 agenda”. They were written by Chris Horner, a Washington DC lawyer and senior fellow at the rightwing thinktank, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, which has received more than $1.3m (£750,000) funding from the US oil giant Exxon Mobil. Mr Horner also acts for the Cooler Heads Coalition, a group set up “to dispel the myth of global warming”.


MORE & LINKS - http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=1370
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank God for Greenpeace. n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is 100% believable ....sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Expose The Bastards! More on CEI....
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Competitive_Enterprise_Institute

Competitive Enterprise Institute
From SourceWatch
The Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) calls itself "a non-profit, non-partisan research and advocacy institute dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government." The Boston Globe has called it "one of Washington's feistiest think tanks." CEI's commentaries frequently appear in media venues such as ABC's 20/20, American Spectator, Christian Science Monitor, Consumers' Research, Crossfire, Forbes, Good Morning America, Larry King Live, MacNeil/Lehrer News Hour, Moneyline, New York Times, Policy Review, PBS, Reader's Digest, USA Today, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and Washington Times. It postures as an advocate of "sound science" in the development of public policy. In fact, it is an ideologically-driven, well-funded front for corporations opposed to safety and environmental regulations that affect the way they do business.

CEI says its main activities are media interest group education, coalition building, policy analysis, advocacy, and litigation. It publishes a newsletter, the CEI Update, as well as various reports with titles such as, "Clean Fuels, Dirty Air, Environmental Politics." Ongoing programs include:

A Death by Regulation project (sometimes referred to as its "Free Market Legal Program") aimed at "shifting the policy debate" about environmental regulations by making the argument that "government intervention carries its own deadly consequences." It claims, for example, that automobile emissions standards drive consumers to buy smaller, flimsier automobiles, causing more deaths from car crashes. Similarly, it argues that there are "adverse public health effects of medical drug regulation and nutritional labeling." Drug regulations, it says, keep new medications off the market. As for nutritional labeling, it believes that wine makers should be able to advertise that wine consumption prevents heart attacks. However, there should be no requirement for labeling of milk from cows treated with genetically-engineered bovine growth hormone.
The Warren T. Brookes Fellowships in Environmental Journalism, named after a now-deceased economist and marketing executive turned conservative newspaper columnist and author of books such as The Individual as Capital and What is Progressive About Taxation? The Brookes Fellowships are "yearly appointments granted to journalists to enable them to research, study and write about private and public approaches to environmental protection. During their Fellowship, appointees are also expected to contribute to the environmental public policy debate through speaking engagements, media interviews and other activities.

An Environmental Policy Program, which claims to focus on "the development and promotion of free market approaches to environmental policy."

CEI belongs to various conservative alliances, including the Alliance for America, Get Government Off Our Backs, Townhall.com, the National Consumer Coalition (a pro-corporate front group headed by Frances B. Smith, the wife of CEI founder Fred Smith), and the Environmental Education Working Group (EEWG), a national umbrella group for organizations working to undermine environmental education in schools. It is linked to the UK-based rightwing thinktank, the International Policy Network, via shared staff and an identical US contact address. It also sponsors several other subsidiary organizations, including:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Greenpeace doesn't have a clue about global climate change.
They are one of the major organizations on the planet working to prevent action on the subject, through their ill-informed and mostly illiterate opposition to nuclear power.

Greenpeace talking about global climate change is rather like Dick Cheney talking about peace. It's just talk, lip service, doublespeak and window dressing.

The Greenpeace "solution" to global climate change, in case no one has noticed, involves providing energy to rich people only (solar PV horseshit mostly and - windmills everywhere). In this sense they are only slightly less self-absorbed and self-serving than Exxon executives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC