Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Saab 9-5 Aero BioPower Concept

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 10:16 AM
Original message
Saab 9-5 Aero BioPower Concept
Sportier Performance and More Environmental Care

Los Angeles, CA -- The 310 hp Saab 9-5 Aero BioPower concept, which makes its
world debut at the 2006 Los Angeles auto show, demonstrates that Saab drivers
can enjoy the benefits of increased power and performance - while having a
greater regard for the environment. In combining the enjoyment of sporty
driving with innovative and rewarding technology, it builds on Saab's strong
Scandinavian tradition of providing 'performance with responsibility'.

Powered by bio-ethanol (E85), a renewable and sustainable fuel, the 2.3-liter
turbocharged engine of the 9-5 Aero SportCombi show car delivers almost 20 per
cent more maximum power (310 v 260 bhp) and 25 per cent more torque (440 Nm/325
lb.ft v 350 Nm/258 lb.ft) than its gasoline equivalent. On the road, this is
expected to translate to zero to 60 mph acceleration in under 6 seconds,
compared to 6.9 seconds with gasoline. This is all achieved alongside a
dramatic improvement in environmental performance, through reduced emissions of
fossil carbon dioxide (CO2), the 'greenhouse' gas that is widely believed to
contribute to global warming.

http://www.saabnet.com/tsn/press/060103A.html


A 2.0L turbo four powered 9-5 that runs E85 is already a big seller in Europe. The power increase comes from ethanol's higher effective octane rating, allowing for more advanced ignition timing without knocking.

Now, if only GM would bring to market Saab's variable compression engine, which was a supercharged 1.6L inline five that got at least 20% better mileage than their turbo 4-cyl with similar power (230 hp). Naw, that might be innovative...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. If we could only get fuel....

Finding biodiesel is difficult enough here in LA (only a handful of places sell it at the pump) I'm sure bioethanol is even more difficult to find.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. There are a few E85 stations here in the Chicago area.
I think primarily because the USPS was testing E85 delivery vehicles here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. E85 is a good solution.
But do realize that Ethanol takes energy to produce! This is great for the environment, but not for the energy problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poopfuel Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. energy to produce?
It doesn't have to. A designed energy system using only renewable fuels (India and Brazil power their alcohol fuel plants with methane), combined with sustainable no pesticide, no herbicide agriculture can work.

Ethanol works a lot better and is of course cleaner at 100 percent, not 85. BTU becomes irrelevant, increase in octane makes up for it. BTUs are not relevant for anything but heat. Not running ICE's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. A pure ethyl alcohol ICE is a problem.
It just will not run when cold. Hence E85.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. ethanol takes less energy to produce than gasoline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Isn't this wonderful? Another fast car.
If your E85 station is remote, you can get there quicker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Hey, don't knock it...
...if enough "sexy" cars have dual/flexi-fuel versions, people might actually start using the damn stuff.
Don't worry, you can have a dual-fuel Peugeot 206 :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Now if they would just come out with a dual-fuel Prius.
Then I would trade in my 2002 Prius for a dual-fuel model. (Or would if I could afford it, which I cannot!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. There may be some out there already...
Edited on Wed Jan-04-06 05:11 PM by Dead_Parrot
running on ethanol (as I understand it) just requires adding a sensor to the fuel line, and tweaking the spark & injection timings, so there may be someone retrofitting it now. A quick google didn't unearth anything, though.

Edit: Or not. If the Prius' electronics are handled by a single unit, it would be quite an undertaking to produce a duel-fuel version. Ho hum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oerdin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Hell
Ford has made every Taurus for the last 5-10 years as a flex fuel vehicle but almost no one uses E85 in them because there aren't any E85 stations for them to fill up at and when there are stations most of the owners don't even know they can use E85. The next big problem is that the law is writen so that a huge break in CAFE standards are offered if automakers make flew fuel vehicles so that they get to make millions more SUVs and other low milage cars. Over all the automakers have used this rule to make lower the nation's average fuel economy.

Much better to stop giving the automakers credits towards lower CAFE standards for flew fuel vehicles and simply mandate that every car must be flew fuel. It only costs a few hundred extra right now and that would drop to next to nothing if every car had to be flew fuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. FFV vehicles do not cost anything extra to the buyer.
You can burn Ethanol 15 (15% ethanol) in any car that runs on gas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC