I have no interest in personally experiencing Antarctica. From what little I've gleaned of the experience, the place is increasingly strewn with the detritus of human habitation.
One sees pictures like this:
and this:
http://www.anta.canterbury.ac.nz/resources/envr.htmlThese pictures may not be a representative sample, but nonetheless they tell a story.
I am only personally acquainted with a few people who tell me they've been there, one of whom is a member of my family, but this sample of Antarctic visitors is, at best, depressing. From what I can tell of these people, they are about as useless as McCain and friends. They seem not to know their asses from their elbows and are scientifically pathetic. I hold a very low estimate of all of them. When I think on the damage done to that place by their mere presence for little more than window dressing, I feel bad, very bad.
This is not meant to malign all Antarctic research. Clearly some important results have been obtained there, especially with respect to atmospheric chemistry. The problems of the atmosphere are without doubt, the most important problems faced by the human race, as I frequently note. Antarctic researchers experimentally confirmed Mario Molina's Nobel Prize winning work. Still I
know that much of what is going on there is about as meaningful as the Senators' junket. There exists a fraction of the set of Antarctic visitors who could spare us all by simply going to Scotland to play golf or to Barbados to sun themselves.