Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cadmium Levels Still Unsafe In Hunan Province River - AFP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 02:07 PM
Original message
Cadmium Levels Still Unsafe In Hunan Province River - AFP
Levels of a cancer-causing chemical found in a Chinese river are still above safety standards after a spill last week, despite earlier official reassurances, state media reported Wednesday.
After nearly a week of clean-up efforts, the amount of cadmium is threatening the safety of drinking water in the downstream regions of the Xiangjiang river in Hunan province, the China Daily reported.

Qu Lili, deputy head of the environmental bureau of Xiangtan city, insisted that tap water for the city of Xiangtan, a city of 700,000 inhabitants, was safe. "Our tap water has remained clean due to emergency chemical treatment," Qu was quoted as saying.

But a southwestern Chinese newspaper, Huaxi Dushi Bao, reported on its website Wednesday that pollution as of Sunday at the local water supply source at Xiawangang was still 22 to 40 times above safe levels.

Water samples taken at three local water-treatment plants were also above safe levels as of Sunday, it said, despite assurances by authorities that day that the quality of water was within safety limits. Officials earlier said they had blocked off the spill and neutralised the cadmium slick with chemicals and diluted it by releasing water from a dam. They had insisted that residents were not in danger.

EDIT

http://www.terradaily.com/news/Toxin_Level_In_Chinese_River_Still_Unsafe.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. "neutralised the slick with chemicals"
Five words that sum up the state of China's rivers, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmm. The common chemicals for "neutralizing" cadmium are very toxic.
These are sulfides.

One wonders if the Cadmium in question was part of the wonderful new solar cell industry in China.

Probably not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. LOL.
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 06:25 PM by Dead_Parrot
I'm afraid it's waste from the zinc smelting plants in the area. One could even argue that if more people used Cd-based PV panels, there would be more demand, and the smelters would be more inclined to collect the stuff: So it's actually your fault for putting people off. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, it's all my fault.
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 08:12 PM by NNadir
One would think with the huge solar business, they would retreive the cadmium without my help, because the solar industry is growing by billions of percent in spite of my mean spirited criticism. It has in fact, just driven all other energy businesses out, but I have yet to be informed of it.

You're right though. We need that cadmium here and now for our vast solar PV industry.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC