Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

YUCCA MOUNTAIN: Nevadans fear new push

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 12:21 AM
Original message
YUCCA MOUNTAIN: Nevadans fear new push
WASHINGTON -- Nevada lawmakers are bracing for new Bush administration efforts to speed work at Yucca Mountain, this time against a backdrop of renewed government interest in nuclear fuel reprocessing.

Department of Energy officials declined Thursday to discuss initiatives that would increase federal spending on reprocessing and possible U.S. offers to recycle radioactive waste from foreign countries.

More details are expected to surface when the Bush administration releases its proposed fiscal 2007 budget on Feb. 6. Some have speculated that Bush might mention nuclear waste in his State of the Union speech Tuesday.

more...

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/Jan-27-Fri-2006/news/5569709.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. They have nobody to blame but themselves
They voted the wrong way, twice, and now I have moved on to other issues. This is their problem now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. wrong, the election was stolen in Nevada ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. O.K.....I know I'm gonna regret this, but how was it "stolen"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. My guess is he's referring to the Sproul registration drives.

...a massive nationwide RNC-financed voter registration drive that tore up dems forms instead of submitting them. It was big news, at least in the blogosphere, back before the election:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/10/13/32821/029

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I posted a ton of research on this awhile back under the Elections section
if you can't find it, let me know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. W told them in 2000 he'd look at other places than Yucca
So they voted for him and he stuck it to them. They stuck it to themselves twice. If they all end up with a radiation glow, they can thank W and their own stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yucca Mountain - The Nation's Shame
In the late 1980's, the nuclear lobby got the federal government to take custody of their spent fuel.

The reason was simple - it would cost them too much money to fund a commercial spent fuel repository themselves.

And nobody wanted it in their back yard - not the utilities that produced it, not Republicans, and not Democrats.

The decision to site the national repository in Nevada was an act of shameful cowardice and bully politics - states that hosted nuclear power plants foisted their waste on a state that was politically weak and did not host a nuclear power plant itself.

A state that also suffered grievously during the days of atmospheric nuclear tests.

Yucca Mountain was supposed to be carefully studied to ensure it was geologically sound before it was to be selected as the nation's spent fuel dump.

But political expediency trumped "sound science" and the decision has been made to develop it - geology be damned - and serious allegations of scientific fraud abound.

The cost of construction spirals upward with each passing year - a few billion more for drip shields and a few billion more to build the railroad leading up to the site...

But wait - there's more...

The total cost of building and operating Yucca Mountain is now ~$65 billion, the Nuclear Waste Fund (funded by a 0.1 cent per kWh surcharge on nuclear electricity) will cover less than half of the cost of project.

Who will pay the rest????????

But wait - there's more...

Because of the delay in construction, nuclear utilities are currently suing the federal government because they haven't disposed of the spent fuel that THEY produced and They made a profit on.

Claims pending against the nation's taxpayers are now more than $56 billion.

But who's counting anyway....

:puke:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC