Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CITGO TELLS STATION OWNER NOT TO CARRY ETHANOL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 04:15 PM
Original message
CITGO TELLS STATION OWNER NOT TO CARRY ETHANOL
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=115&topic_id=40697&mesg_id=40699

I don't have an E85 car so I can buy only one or two dollars at a time, but I support the station with purchases and calls for other people to purchase. I plan on asking him to put in an E15 pump. The owner broke relations with Citco because they did not want him offering alcohol fuels.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is because the fuels were not from Citgo.
When you have a branded station, and do not offer branded fuels, that is a franchise violation.

No shame to Citgo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam_laddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Citgo
I believe that Citgo is owned by the Venezuelan national oil company. There's only one Citgo
station left in this city, SFAIK, and if it wasn't such a drive to get to, I'd fill up there all the time,
as I think Chavez ought to be supported in his drive to get out from under the economic yoke
of multi-national corporations, World Bank and IMF, essentially the enslavers world-wide.

Also, per your other thread, I've heard consistently that all the alternative fuels require more
energy to produce than they "save." Mostly fossil fuels are used for the heat processes needed
for the conversion. Now if there were a non-extractive source of energy which could substitute
for the oil or coal currently used, it might make sense. Maybe solar energy could be captured
in some way to drive the conversion. Or nuclear, if made truly safe and the "hot" waste can be
re-processed. Interesting engineering challeges ahead.

Bush and hydrogen - absurd on the science. More bicycles, more sweaters, more compact
cities, more mass transit where feasible (Viva le Metro!) BTW, on dailykos, poster "Jerome a Paris"
(and others) often have very knowledgeable posts about energy issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Curse that Chavez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. the practical result is ethanol is restricted from market access.
THis is why a public policy to make ethanol more widely available is necessary - in other words, when it's the public interest - FIND A WAY. LIke Citco could offer E85 of their own - but that won't ever happen until the public acts to make it happen.

I would like to be able to find E10 or E15 and if I had a FFV - E85 - especially since E85 is selling for $1.69 a gallon!!

..GOSH, I wonder if THAT may be why Citgo doesn't want an ethanol pump at that station.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, Write Citgo!
Companies tend to respond to consumer demand only once they are aware that the demand exists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm pretty sure Citgo sells E15 in Wisconsin
I think all gas stations are required to here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Not yet. Legislation is pending in WI to require stations to carry ethanol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC