Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ethanol vs. gasoline study.. ethanol looks pretty good..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
trekbiker Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:36 PM
Original message
Ethanol vs. gasoline study.. ethanol looks pretty good..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pure ethanol in an Internal Combustion Engine is a problem.
At low temperatures (below about 40 F) the fuel does not properly combust. Not a problem once the engine is running, but a big problem when you are starting. Hence E85, which is 15% gasoline.

Now, an EXTERNAL combustion engine, such as a Sterling-Electric Hybrid or a Steam car could burn pure ETOH without any problems whatsoever.

Moreover either a Sterling-Electric or a Steam vehicle would produce no NOx pollutants, which any compression engine will make when the fuel explodes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. heating plug?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. A late friend of mine developed a car with a heater for the ETOH
This was complicated and presented a safety hazard in a crash. You see fuel burns. vapor explodes. Any large amount of fuel heated to its vapor point is a danger. Whereas injecting fuel into a hot engine only heats the fuel just about to be used, ditto for a carburetor to a lesser degree, though we all know about carburetor fires and explosions when things get out of order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Where does the ethanol need to be heated?
Is it in the tank? Or the fuel line? Or both? Could a thermostat be used? No need to heat it to boiling, I assume. Just heat it to 50F, or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Nobody is selliing pure ethanol (except in Brazil) it's always blended in
varying proportions with gasoline.


Argonne National Laboratory Study

USDA study in 2004 condluded a 65% gain for ethanol production.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Rugged mass produced stirling engines would be a very fine thing.
They could be used in hybrid cars, cogeneration schemes, etc., and could be fueled by almost anything.

There are a few commercial products that are almost there.

It seems I really should be able to buy a home furnace powered by wood pellets, biofuels, DME, natural gas, whatever, that makes electricity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. NO heating problems with 85% ethanol. THe only place I have heard where
have used 100% ethanol is Brazil. But I don't think they use it anymore. Just 85% ethanol.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. NObody is using 100% ethanol that I Know of. All is 10%, 15% or 85%
Ethanol - no heating problems. There are about 5 million FFVs on the road in US now that use 85% ethanol. (many in Minnesota, they have pretty cold winters up there) NO reported problems with startups in winter.

Ethanol in an ICE is much better than gasoline. NOt only does it burn cleaner (better, not only for environment but also for the engine). Ethanol has an octane rating of 105 gasaoine (high test about 92-93) this means you can operate at higher compression, yielding greater power output! IF you do this you get just as good as miles-per-gal with E85 as with gasoline. Saab 9-5 BioPower has computer controlled variable valve (and ignition ) timing with turbo-charging. IT gets MORE power with E85 (about 25% more) and gets just as good as mileage a with gas (the FFV vehicle is able to use both).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. there is one scientist
saying it takes MORE fossil fuel to MAKE ethanol than the fossil fuel ethanol replaces in the gas tank.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hence the odd switchgrass reference
that NPR helpfully explained (having pointed it out, at least to me, since the SOTU address isn't something I've heard or read).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. And many more saying that it doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Pimentel and Patzek's stuff has been exposed as fraudulent and
of no scientific merit. YOu get a net energy GAIN in producing ethanol.

Wang, Argonne National Laboratory - 38% gain (gasoline 19% LOSS)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=115&topic_id=35670

Michigan State University study - 56% GAIN

USDA study (2004) - 67% gain

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=115&topic_id=36988

The recent erroneous report prepared by Cornell University's David Pimentel and the University of California at Berkeley's Tad Patzek continue to perpetuate the myth that the production of biofuels such as ethanol and biodiesel has no energy benefit. Mr. Patzek is the director of UC's Oil Consortium, which receives funding from the oil industry including Chevron and Phillips Petroleum. Previous partners have included BP, Mobil USA, Statoil and Unocal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Or just silly.
It doesn't like the therm I studied in college or grad school.

Coastie, PhD (ChemE)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. uh oh, bush's switchgrass! what about hemp as a source of biomass
you could strip the leaves and small side branches for ethanol and use the main trunk for fiber.

hemp is very hardy, weed and disease free more or less, and drought tolerant too.

The cotton lobby is willing to die to keep hemp from becoming a legal and common crop.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/liberaltshirts.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Hemp is the BEST source of fermentable biomass.
And the seed oil is useful as a fuel as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. My Understanding Is That Switchgrass Is Preferred On The High Plains
Dakotas, Western KS, NE, OK, Eastern MT, WY.

Native, drought resistent and perennial.

The sane policy would be a mix of many plants, all selected for their adaptability to the local area.

I would not want to depend on a mono-culture for energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Hemp is overrated as a fuel.
Edited on Thu Feb-02-06 06:29 PM by Massacure
Sometimes I think pro-hemp people these days are just as bad as the anti-hemp people of the 1920s.

Hemp makes sense for to replace cotton for cloth and wood pulp for paper. It doesn't make much sense to grow it for fuel though, as there are better crops available. Algae used for biodiesel is at the top of the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC