Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

this is really scary stuff-methane bubble

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
poopfuel Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:18 AM
Original message
this is really scary stuff-methane bubble
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. They really ought to call it a fart. But that's a potty word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Too bad there isn't a way to capture it
That's a hell of a lot of gas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. There are people studying the possibility.
It's not in a very convenient location, and it's not especially stable when handled. If we try to harvest it, we may end up releasing as much as we capture. Or more. Some people propose the possibility of cascade effects. Methane-releasing avalanches.

A climate time-bomb, and one that can't be defused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Burning it might not be such a good idea, either
It's a greenhouse gas that releases greenhouse gas when it's burned.

As a short-term expedient, it's probably best left alone. We're going to need some kind of low-carbon-load energy, whether it's nuclear or solar/wind/tidal, or all of them.

In the short-term, we have no good solutions, and even the "winners" are going to have to accept some bad compromises. But over a period of 50-100 years, we might actually have a chance ... if we don't die off first.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. And after 100 years or so, all that methane turns into CO2
" . . . So tonight we're gonna party like it's K-T Extinction Time!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well it's the methane itself that will do the damage
From the article:
Methane is more than 20 times as strong a greenhouse gas as carbon dioxide.


It would actually be good for the methane to be broken down into CO2, if that's possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. So who's going to sit out there with a match?
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. We could start dropping tons of methane-eating bacteria on the deposits
Edited on Fri Feb-24-06 06:03 PM by htuttle
http://www.tigr.org/news/pr_09_20f_04.shtml

I think there are already a number of species that metabolize and fix methane (such as Methylococcus capsulatus, according to the link above), but I'm not sure if they could utilize frozen methane (probably not?).

Maybe we could design one that could eat frozen methane?
(yikes...that could lead to a worse nightmare in too many ways...major desperation play).

I can't think of much else to do, unless there are some chemical reactants that could fix methane into something solid (very quickly).

Either technique could probably be used to get a start on cleaning the methane back out of the atmosphere once the deposit do melt. Not that it's would do our own civilization any good, but might reduce the amount of time that methane poisons the atmosphere. The next dominant species on the planet would thank us for cleaning up after ourselves...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Those deposits are pretty cold
Generally just above the freezing point of water. Is M. capsulatus adaptable to icy water?

And those deposits are in the form of mixed methane clathrates. Can these organisms consume clathrates?

The article mentions that symbionts are required as hosts for the bacilli, too. That could both pose problems and provide solutions. But it's still the cold that concerns me about the feasibility of the project.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. there's a certain amount of cosmic justice in this . . .
humans mistreating the Earth to such an extent that she simply farts us out of existence . . . along with most other life forms . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty headed animal...
food trough wiper. I fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries.

Go and boil your bottoms!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Assume it's released, and then it slowly oxidizes...
how much heat energy is released from "burning" it (if oxidation over 100 years can be called "burning")? I wonder if that might be significant too. It's quite a lot of methane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm reminded of earthquake prevention schemes.
Some people have proposed the plan of triggering regular small earthquakes on purpose, with the intention of releasing strain-energy slowly, instead of one catastrophic burst.

I wonder if these enormous methane hydrate deposits might be treated the same way. Release them over time in small amounts, in an attempt to avert a catastrophic release.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC