Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vast wind farm proposed (300 MW, Buzzards Bay, Mass.)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:12 PM
Original message
Vast wind farm proposed (300 MW, Buzzards Bay, Mass.)
http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/05-06/05-23-06/01mainphoto.htm

NEW BEDFORD — In a proposal that would dramatically change the appearance of Buzzards Bay, a Boston developer wants to build a $750 million offshore wind farm comprised of 90 to 120 turbines in the ecologically sensitive waterway.

Windmills 407 feet high would be planted in three areas of the bay if Patriot Renewables LLC — a renewable energy subsidiary of Jay Cashman Inc.-- can win the numerous approvals needed for the mega-project.

The proposed sites are about 3 to 4 miles off the coast of Sconticut Neck in Fairhaven, Barneys Joy in Dartmouth and Naushon Island, one of the Elizabeth Islands. An estimated 30 to 40 turbines would be erected at each of the three sites.

The locations of the turbines, which would generate an annual total of about 300 megawatts of power, are subject to change based on feedback from the public and other stakeholders, company president Jay Cashman told The Standard-Times during an editorial board meeting yesterday.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sadly, I'll wager Mass.'s Democratic senators will be against it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And you would win, just like the other one they oppose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Exactly. Kennedy cited worries over migratory bird patterns...
but I think we're all smart enough to know that that was just a cover for the real reason, NIMBY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why is the location always major bird flight paths/feeding areas?
Screwing the view can be dealt with - you get used to it - like the ugly Santa Barbara Beach and the oil equipment.

But why can't we find wind locations that are not migratory fowl kill zones if turbines are set up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Mass Audubon is OK with Cape Wind
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. it wont be ok with the rich land developers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Did not know that - the birds are part of every discussion and there
is no reference to Mass Audubon signing off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thanks skids :-)
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throckmorton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Maybe the two are inexorably linked.
Edited on Tue May-23-06 02:11 PM by Throckmorton
Migrating birds using the natural boost in speed that sustained winds give them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. hmm... is 300 MW the theoretical maximum...
or practical maximum?

With wind power, you had only better expect, on average, 25% of the capacity of the machine to be constantly deliverable to the consumer load demand.

and by the way, these things kill birds, lots of them. and putting them out at sea costs alot of money not only to setup, but to go out and fix them when they break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. about bird kills
and by the way, these things kill birds, lots of them.

I periodically repost the following on DU:

Some windmills, such as the ones in the Altamont Pass in CA, have been built along bird migration paths. This is a bad idea.

The amount of birds killed by windmills is minuscule compared to the number killed by other human activity.

According to the US Fish & Wildlife Service...(http://www.fws.gov/birds/mortality-fact-sheet.pdf ) annual deaths out of a typical fall population of 20 billion in the US:
* 97-976 million birds dead from window strikes
* 4-40 million from communication towers
* 60 million from cars
* 72 million from pesticides
* 39 million from cats in Wisconsin alone(!)
* 10s to 100s of thousands in fish catching

And the total for wind turbines...wait for it...: 33000!!! So really, unless you're putting the wind turbines on top of the nests of piping plovers on Cape Cod, there are bigger problems for our feathered friends. Like cats and windows.

We cannot harvest energy from our environment without ecological impact. Some methods however (wind,solar,nuclear, tidal, geothermal) have lesser impact than others (fossil fuels).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. There's an experimantal turbine in NZ...
That's been there since 1993: situated next to a wildlife reserve in the "Island of birds", it finally claimed a bluebird in 2004.

Not really a huge death toll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Thank you!
My usual response to the "windmills kill birds" argument is to
suggest the extermination of all cats as this would save over a
thousand times more birds ... at least you are more subtle!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC