Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ehrlich (R - MD) Wants Weaker Water Pollution Rules For Baltimore

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 12:36 PM
Original message
Ehrlich (R - MD) Wants Weaker Water Pollution Rules For Baltimore
The Ehrlich administration has proposed pollution limits for Baltimore's harbor that are weaker than the state suggested in 2003, triggering complaints from some environmental groups. Complying with a requirement of the federal Clean Water Act, the Maryland Department of the Environment proposed limits last month for nitrogen and other nutrient pollution running into the harbor from sewage treatment plants, industries and stormwater drains. Nitrogen pollution from sewage and other sources causes algae blooms and low-oxygen "dead zones" that kill marine life.

The limit of 5.3 million pounds per year of nitrogen proposed by the MDE would reduce current pollution flow into the harbor by 37 percent, according to the state's plan. But the agency suggested pollution cuts of more than 50 percent in a draft 2003 proposal circulated to an advisory panel, state records show.

The Chesapeake Bay Foundation sent a letter of protest to the state yesterday, saying it was "surprised and shocked" to hear of the new limits, which it said should be reconsidered.

Kim Coble, the foundation's executive director for Maryland, said in an interview that the state won't be able to meet its commitments to improve the Chesapeake Bay's water quality by 2010 without tighter restrictions. "The fact of the matter is that every person, every industry, every municipality has to step up to the plate to improve the quality of the bay," Coble said. "So when we have the MDE proposing increases to the nitrogen loads, it is five steps backwards from the goals we are trying to achieve."

EDIT

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-md.nutrients07jul07,0,3033245.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Relax pollution controls on the shores of the CHESAPEAKE ?? No way!
Good luck with that one. Fisherman and oystermen will be heard screaming all the way to the statehouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC