Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A detail on the Swedish plan to eliminate oil.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 08:11 AM
Original message
A detail on the Swedish plan to eliminate oil.
Edited on Sat Jul-22-06 08:12 AM by NNadir
The Commission writes that Swedish industry should target a 25-40% reduction in oil use by 2020 and that the transport sector should halve its oil dependency. In part, the Commission hopes to achieve this by supporting the production of dimethyl ether (DME) from black liquor waste, with an expansion of DME production in Sweden and investments in sales and distribution infrastructure. The Commission has recommended that the Swedish government does not support the natural gas pipeline that E.on is planning to build together with Gazprom to supply gas to central Sweden. Persson commented that the government could block the project as support for the venture could obstruct the development of alternatives to fossil fuels.


http://www.vattenfall.com/www/vf_com/vf_com/370103press/370135press/385357press/index.jsp?pmid=72550&WT.ac=content

The Swedish plan for the use of DME, a good one, is essentially biomass based, using wood products as a source of methanol.

The creation of a DME infrastructure is flexible, and should excessive reliance on wood cause ecological problems in Sweden, they will be able to adjust that infrastructure accordingly.

This is a piece of environmental good news. Note the resistance to using fossil fuel sources for their DME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. resistance to being held captive by the russian energy company too nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-22-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Any reason, good or bad, for not using fossil fuels is fine with me.
Of course, if the Swedes end up using wood as a source of DME, the climate change impact will obviously depend on the rate at which they plant replacement wood, and the rate at which the trees grow.

However the DME infrastructure will give them lots of other options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC