Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study of Songbirds Finds High Levels of Mercury

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:43 PM
Original message
Study of Songbirds Finds High Levels of Mercury
A biologist studying wild songbirds in New York State has found that all 178 woodland birds he tested last year had unusually high levels of mercury in their blood and feathers, a sign that the toxic chemical has spread farther in the environment than previously thought.

<snip>

The presence of mercury in lakes and streams is already well documented, and the New York Department of Health advises people to restrict the consumption of any freshwater fish caught in most of the state to no more than one meal a week.

But Dr. Evers is one of the first scientists to test for wildlife mercury contamination beyond fish. He began his work in this area in 1998 and found that common loons, which eat fish, had highly elevated levels of mercury that made them lethargic and caused their reproductive rates to drop. He then decided to study songbirds, which never eat fish. In particular, he wanted to study the wood thrush, a small bird with a distinctive song that was once common throughout the Northeast. The population of wood thrushes has declined 45 percent in recent decades.

<snip>

Dr. Evers’s work suggests that when mercury falls on land, it is absorbed by soil and by fallen leaves that are consumed by worms and insects. Songbirds then feed on the bugs, absorbing the mercury.

More: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/25/nyregion/25birds.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll bet that a survey of birds measuring coal's other pollutant...
...carbon dioxide, will also produce unhappy results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe not so much
Birds can migrate- and change their migration patterns faster- than other animal in other niches.

I think many species of birds are uniquely adaptable to relatively rapid climate change.

Comparatively speaking-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. power plants also have lots of emissions of cadmium, lead, radioactive iso
topes, etc.
They emit much more radiation than nuclear plants- making surroundings including fish and wildlife radioactive-
as in the Smith coal plant polluting St Andrews Bay, Panama City, Fl.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC