Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wood McKinzie/Fubro Robertson Report - Arctic Reserves Can Never Replace OPEC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 03:54 PM
Original message
Wood McKinzie/Fubro Robertson Report - Arctic Reserves Can Never Replace OPEC
Edited on Wed Nov-01-06 03:55 PM by hatrack
HOUSTON (Reuters) - There isn't enough oil under the Arctic Circle to replace crude from OPEC, according to a study released on Wednesday by analyst group Wood MacKenzie and seismic research firm Fubro Robertson.

Under the circle, 233 billion barrels of oil equivalent in crude and natural gas have been discovered and 166 billion barrels of oil equivalent are thought to remain undiscovered, said the study's lead author, Andrew Latham, vice president of energy consulting at Wood McKenzie.

Eighty-five percent of discovered reserves and 74 percent of expected reserves is made up of natural gas, Latham said. "The oil-gas mix is not ideal because remote gas is often harder to transport to markets," Latham told reporters in Houston.

"In addition, export and technology constraints are expected to delay production as a large portion of the communal gas until 2050," he said.

EDIT

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061101/sc_nm/energy_arctic_study_dc_1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-01-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, we can stop melting it, now?
Didn't think so. Oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffery Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. geology
I actually suspect that, as George Noory believes, much of the Arctic warming and melting is geological, rather than part of climate change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC