MountainLaurel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 10:49 AM
Original message |
Inquiry Turns to Humans on Pollutant, Hormone Tie |
|
:hide: :scared: :hide: Growing evidence that chemicals in the environment can interfere with animals' hormone systems -- including the discovery that male Potomac River fish are growing eggs -- has focused the attention of environmentalists and scientists on a new question: Are humans also at risk?
A decade ago, the very idea that pollutants could interfere with a body's chemical messages was near the fringes of science. But now, it is an urgent topic for lawmakers and researchers around the world, and especially in the Washington area. In recent years, researchers have linked some common chemicals to troubling changes in laboratory rodents and wild animals, including reproductive defects, immune-system alterations and obesity.
For now, no connections to human ailments have been proved. But some studies have provided hints that people might be affected by crossed hormones, and activists wonder if this kind of pollution could contribute to diabetes, birth defects and infertility.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/03/AR2006120300992.html
|
LiberalEsto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Maybe * has been drinking Potomac water |
|
That could explain a lot of things
|
Miss Chybil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
2. In Britain the estrogen from birth control pills are changing the fish in the rivers. |
|
Could be the same problem here.
|
MountainLaurel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
A larger, more disturbing, problem in the Potomac watershed is believed to be runoff from chicken and dairy farms in Maryland and Virginia containing the various hormones that those animals are being fed in order to get better production.
|
donsu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
4. yes - man breasts are a change - back when even fat men didn't |
|
have breasts. now even young slender men have puffed protruding nipples.
|
One_Life_To_Give
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
You say that like it's a bad thing. :7
|
lildreamer316
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-04-06 02:00 PM by lildreamer316
|
lildreamer316
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Oh, I dunno Why on earth would you think that something that causes mutations in nature would cause mutations in humans? Don't you know we're above that sort of thing??:sarcasm:
|
kestrel91316
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
7. We're just one more animal species to be adversely affected |
|
by endocrine disruptors. More proof that we evolved from our animal cousins and weren't just plunked down here as the perfect imitation of God.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 11:09 PM
Response to Original message |