Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Search Intensifies For Crops That Can Withstand Global Warming - Guardian

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:20 PM
Original message
Search Intensifies For Crops That Can Withstand Global Warming - Guardian
An unprecedented effort to protect the world's food supplies from the ravages of climate change will be launched today by an international consortium of scientists. The move marks a growing recognition that serious changes in weather patterns are inevitable over the coming decades, and that society must begin to adapt.

Some £200m a year will be poured into the research by governments across the world to help agricultural experts develop crops that can withstand heat and drought, find more efficient farming techniques and make better use of increasingly fragile soil and scarce water supplies.

Robert Zeigler, director general of the International Rice Research Institute, said: "The impacts of climate change on agriculture will add significantly to the development challenges of reducing poverty and ensuring sufficient food production for a growing population. The livelihoods of billions of people will be severely challenged as crop yields decline."

The Stern review of the economics of climate change said a 2-3C rise in average global temperatures would put 30-200 million more people at risk of hunger. Once temperatures rise 3C, 250-550 million extra people will be at risk, more than half in Africa and western Asia. At 4C and above, global food production is likely to be hit hard. The British scientist James Lovelock warned last week that such food shortages could trigger a growing number of conflicts this century between nations desperate to find fertile land to feed their people.

EDIT

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,1963387,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm. 200 million pounds....
About what we're spending every 8 weeks occupying Iraq, destroying villages in order to save them, etc.

Just to put the insanity into perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Actually, that's about what we spend in two or three days in Iraq
Just thought you might want to know . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oops, that's what I get for doing arithmetic in my head.
No matter how bad I think it is, it's worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I know the feeling . . .
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ehem..cannabis....ehem
It's 18 inch taproot busts through hard pack soil, helps reduce erosion, efficient biomass accumulator, most parts of plant are usable -- several are edible, wide range of tolerable climates (bangladesh to Pacific NW to Lebanon to Columbia).

It's not a miracle plant -- just damned useful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. The soil wouldn't BE "increasingly fragile"...
...if we hadn't mono-cropped and chemical-blasted the living shit out of some of the world's most fertile and robust soils so that mega-agribusiness could keep reaping obscene profits out of highly subsidized commodities.

But never mind me, just go on worrying about whether mega-agribusiness "experts" can figure out a way to wrest yet more obscene highly subsidized profits from what's left of our soil as the climate changes.

Meanwhile, real farmers, indigenous peoples, home gardeners, seed-savers, and heritage-crop preservationist wackos will continue doing what we'd do anyway, keeping the possibility of human survival on this ravaged globe alive.

Let us know when you're ready to look at real, sustainable food production and distribution methods.

irritatedly,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yup, I got one, I'm growing a whole crop of sand in my backyard! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC