...with more potential to change the global energy paradigm."
I am not so sure about the accuracy of this prediction. How much of an investment is required to purchase 150 megawatts of photovoltaic cells? This would represent an investment of <150 megawatts X 1.30 per watt> or $195 million. What is the espected economic life of that investment? I'm thinking these photovoltaic cells must be repeatedly replaced much like light bulbs in our homes. The prospectus talks about long term supply contracts as follows:
<snip>
.....We recently entered into long-term solar module supply contracts (the “Long Term Supply Contracts”) with six project developers and system integrators headquartered in Germany that allow for approximately € 1.2 billion ($1.4 billion at an assumed exchange rate of $1.20/ € 1.00) in sales from 2006 to 2011. These Long Term Supply Contracts contemplate the manufacture and sale of a total of 745MW of solar modules. Under each of our Long Term Supply Contracts, we have a unilateral option, exercisable until December 31, 2006, to increase the sales volumes and extend such contract through 2012. We plan to exercise each option promptly following the completion of this offering, after which these contracts will allow for approximately € 1.9 billion ($2.3 billion at an assumed exchange rate of $1.20/ € 1.00) in sales from 2006 to 2012 for a total of 1,270MW of solar modules. The sales contemplated by the Long Term Supply Contracts increase year over year through 2008 and remain constant thereafter. The Long Term Supply Contracts require a 6.5% annual decline in sales price and an approximately 5% annual increase from 2007 to 2009 in the minimum average sellable Watts per module. As a result, to maintain our historical gross margins we must reduce our average manufacturing cost per Watt by at least the same rate at which our contractual prices decrease. In addition, these contracts can be terminated by our customers if we are unable to meet the minimum average annual number of Watts per module required in a given year. The information in this paragraph is designed to summarize the financial terms of our Long Term Supply Contracts and is not intended to provide guidance on our future operating results, including revenues or profitability.
http://www.hoovers.com/free/co/secdoc.xhtml?ID=151560&ipage=4770530Now compare this investment to say new generational thorium based high temperature gas cooled nuclear reactors which can be built to produce 150 to 800 megawatts of continuous power for over 25 years of economic life with virtually no added fuel costs and a minimum of operating expenses over the life of the investment.
http://www.ne.doe.gov/pdfFiles/AFCICompRpt2003.pdf<snip>
2.4 Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor Systems
Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor concepts offer a closed fuel cycle through high conversion or breeding of fissile materials. A breeding capability around unity may be of interest if the GFR is used in a synergistic fuel cycle with LWRs. GFRs using a direct Brayton cycle have the potential to combine the advantages of high sustainability and economic competitiveness while making nuclear energy benefit from the most efficient conversion technology available.
The reference concept is a 600 MWth/288 MWe, helium cooled reactor system operating with an outlet temperature of about 850°C and using a direct Brayton cycle gas turbine. The thermal efficiency is estimated to approach 48%. There are several fuel design options including both the prismatic (with fuel particles or composite fuels) and fuel pins (with actinide compound/solid solution). A major challenge is to develop adequate fuel technologies and associated core design and treatment processes to preserve most of the attractive safety features of thermal GCRs.
<MORE>
<caution 3.6mgb sized file>
http://gif.inel.gov/roadmap/pdfs/016_description_of_candidate_gas-cooled_reactor_systems_report.pdfIt is all good, if we can get away from our nearly total dependance on burning up fossil fuels for our power needs over the next 50 years.