Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2006 Antarctic Ozone Hole Biggest Ever - But Arctic Ozone Picture Very Different - AFP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 08:39 PM
Original message
2006 Antarctic Ozone Hole Biggest Ever - But Arctic Ozone Picture Very Different - AFP
A study released Monday shows just how dramatic the ozone loss in the Antarctic has been over the past 20 years compared to the same phenomenon in the Arctic. The study found "massive" and "widespread" localized ozone depletion in the heart of Antartica's ozone hole region, beginning in the late 1970s, but becoming more pronounced in the 1980s and 90s.

The US government scientists who conducted the study said that there was an almost complete absence of ozone in certain atmospheric air samples taken after 1980, compared to earlier decades. In contrast, the ozone losses in the Arctic were sporadic, and even the greatest losses did not begin to approach the regular losses in the northern hemisphere, the researchers said. "Typically the Arctic loss is dramatically less than the Antarctic loss," said Robert Portmann, an atmospheric scientist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Boulder, Colorado.

Scientists have been tracking the expanding ozone hole over Antarctica for some 20 years now. In October, NASA scientists reported that this year's hole is the biggest ever, stretching over nearly 11 million square miles. In Antarctica, local ozone depletion at some altitudes frequently exceeded 90 percent, and often reached up to 99 percent during the Antarctic winter in the period after 1980 compared to earlier decades, the researchers said.

In the Arctic, the losses occasionally peaked at 70 percent, and some losses of 50 percent were seen in the mid 1990s, when temperatures were particularly low, but the scale and scope of the problem was much less than what was seen in the Northern Hemisphere.

EDIT

http://www.terradaily.com/2006/061225220024.2jvv8dc6.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
qnr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Umm... the Arctic /is/ in the northern hemisphere - it was a little disconcerting
seeing that :/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC