Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP Screws over Middle Class W Hybrid Tax Credit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 10:13 PM
Original message
GOP Screws over Middle Class W Hybrid Tax Credit
Hybrid tax credit bait and switch
Edward F. McQuarrie
Friday, January 26, 2007


If you are among the 150,000-plus proud purchasers of a hybrid gas-electric car during 2006, please sit down. I have bad news. Many of you will not receive the full tax credit that you expected.

To recap, in 2005, Congress passed an energy bill with numerous incentives to encourage conservation. One of these provisions provided a tax credit, beginning January 2006, for purchasers of approved hybrid gas-electric automobiles. This tax credit can be substantial -- up to $3,150 for the Toyota Prius, perhaps the best known hybrid.

Unfortunately, unless you earn more than $750,000 a year, you can't be sure you will qualify for the full published credit for your vehicle. This "gotcha" applies even if you bought the car well before October, when the tax credit for Toyota vehicles began to be reduced, per the 2005 law, because more than 60,000 Toyota hybrids had been sold.

Few Californian families with income between $150,000 and $500,000 will qualify for a penny of the credit. And under this bizarre legislation, at lower income levels, the smaller your family, the bigger the credit allowed. Likewise, single taxpayers will mostly be OK.

-snip
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2007/01/26/EDGC7N75RT1.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. lunacy
figures
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank god they got rid of the Estate Tax! Whew! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. WANT TO REALLY GET PO-ed? Read this
Hybrid Watchdog: SUV Tax Loophole vs. Hybrid Tax Credits

"A Hummer of a Loophole"
Origin of the SUV Tax Deduction: "A Hummer of a Loophole"

A 1997 provision in the U.S. tax code (Section 179) provided small businesses with a tax write-off of up to $25,000 for a vehicle weighing more than 6,000 pounds- used 50% of the time for work purposes. The original intent behind this provision was to encourage investments in pickup trucks, minivans, and other needed service vehicles.  A far smaller incentive was provided for cars--less than $7,000 over two years.
Today’s average vehicle fuel economy is at a 20 year low (24 mpg on government tests).

The explosion of SUV, pickup, and minivan sales in America's passenger vehicle fleet has turned this small business benefit into a massive loophole in the tax law.  Currently, 38 different passenger SUVs including the Lincoln Navigator, which nets a combined 15 miles per gallon according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Cadillac Escalade (16 mpg), the BMW X5 (18 mpg), the Mercedes-Benz ML55 (16 mpg), and the notorious Hummer H2 (estimated 11 mpg) all weigh more than 6,000 pounds.  This loophole allows some of the most fuel-inefficient passenger vehicles on the road today to qualify for a significant tax break.

In 2003, the Bush administration proposed increasing the tax deduction to $75,000. Lawmakers responded by expanding it to a whopping $100,000 as part of the $350 million tax cut package.  Yet Congress did not change the weight-based classification of the vehicles, creating a huge benefit for the largest, least efficient vehicles.

-snip
http://www.hybridcenter.org/hybrid-vs-hummer.html

?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. If I Build an EV and Put in 6000 Pounds of Batteries, Will It Qualify for Both Tax Credits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. BTW this site is a project of the Union on Concerned Scientists!
Edited on Mon Jan-29-07 10:45 PM by mod mom
oops meant to link to thread # 3, my bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Republicans - always finding new ways to screw people over. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC