Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Experts Target Rice As Climate Culprit - AP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 03:06 PM
Original message
Experts Target Rice As Climate Culprit - AP
Source: Associated Press

Experts Target Rice As Climate Culprit
By MICHAEL CASEY, AP Environmental Writer
10:00 AM PDT, May 1, 2007

BANGKOK, Thailand -- As delegates to a climate conference here
debate how to reduce greenhouse gases, one of the problems --
and a possible solution -- lies in the rice fields that cover much
of Thailand, the rest of Asia and beyond.

Methane emissions from flooded rice paddies contribute to global
warming just as coal-fired power plants, automobile exhausts and
other sources do with the carbon dioxide they spew into the
atmosphere.

In fact, the report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change meeting this week in Bangkok concludes that rice
production was a main cause of rising methane emissions in the
20th century. It calls for better controls.

-snip-

For Asians, modifying rice production might prove easier and
cheaper than some of the other fixes proposed in the IPCC draft
report, such as switching from coal to solar, wind power or
other renewable energy sources.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/wire/sns-ap-climate-change-rice,1,6049238.story



The article goes on to describe how rice production generate less
methane and why some farmers have not changed their practices.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, balls. HOW long have people been growing rice in paddies?
A damn LONG time.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Actually they're pretty sure they found a carbon signature
that goes back to the start of agriculture, and has only increased since then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Increased, along with the population, yes. But I think it's better if we concentrate on fossil
fuels than rice paddies. Paddies, and farting cows, should be the second-tier order of concern, yes?

(I'm not saying that they're not problems; just saying that they're probably not the MAIN problem.)

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. She definitely sucks as Secretary of State, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I was wondering who else noticed the capitalization.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Hi, Redstone. I just didn't want to pass up an opportunity to disparage
Condoleezza Rice.

If I had, I just don't think I could live with myself.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. And I'm glad you took the opportunity.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dry rice production prevails in some parts of the world.
It could presumably be introduced in those parts of Asia that now grow rice in paddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't know how much of this I believe.
Methane production from rice paddies is, of course, real. However! Lowland rice paddies are often located in regions which were naturally marshland prior to the advent of agriculture and the conversion of the land to supporting humans. This swampland was a natural greenhouse gas producer and is a normal contributor to our atmospheric equilibrium. Does this cover all rice fields? Not hardly. In many parts of the world, rice paddies also exist in areas which had previously been dry, and methane emitted from these lands is a net gain for the atmosphere. Right? Not neccesarily. Over the past 300 years an estimated half billion acres of swamps, bogs, marshes, backwaters, mangroves, estuaries, vernal pools, and inter tidal zones have been drained and converted to urban use, dryland farming, or lost to the encroaching sea worldwide. This wetlands produced methane prior to their destruction, but today produce only less volatile CO2 and dust (excepting, of course, those wetlands that have been converted to rice paddies). I don't know how many acres of rice are in production today, but I would suspect that any increased emissions from rice production would be wholly or partially offset by the reduction of natural emissions caused by wetlands destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. The big issue with rice paddies is how they are flooded and fertilized.
The article states that, with traditional methods,
manure fertilizer and unharvested rice decompose
in the airless flooded paddy, producing exceptionally
large amounts of methane. As rice production grows
to feed growing populations, this can be a serious
problem. Not all wetlands are equal.

The article goes on to say farmers in places like China
have started to use alternative fertilizers, less water
and different kinds of land to reduce methane output.
Not all farmers are adopting these changes however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC