Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Saudis May Not 'Need' to Raise Oil Capacity After 2009

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 11:54 AM
Original message
Saudis May Not 'Need' to Raise Oil Capacity After 2009
By Maher Chmaytelli and Nesa Subrahmaniyan

May 2 (Bloomberg) -- Saudi Arabia, holder of the world's largest oil reserves, may not need to increase its oil-production capacity after 2009, the country's oil minister said, because conservation and alternative energy sources could curb the consumption of oil.

``As we approach 2009, we will look at our plan and see if demand warrants additional increase in capacity,'' the minister, Ali al-Naimi, said at a press conference after a conference with Asian energy officials in the Saudi capital of Riyadh.

``Our feeling now is that with the thrust and push for conservation, for efficiency of use, for use of alternative-sources energy, we probably need not go beyond 12.5'' million barrels a day, the capacity projected for the end of 2009, Naimi said.

``But that is guessing right now,'' he added. ``We don't know what the impact of the measures of conservation, of efficiency and alternative fuels is going to do to demand.''

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20602099&sid=ataHAA7GX3js&refer=energy


Considering that just getting to 12.5mbpd, let alone beyond it, may be beyond their abilities now, this looks like a step in the direction of admitting they won't be oiling our future for the next century as they have been suggesting until very recently.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. "may not" = "cannot"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. well then...they'd better make hay while the sun shines and screw us while they can n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. And we all how just how supportive the al Saud have been of alternative energy . . .
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. There should be a pool.
A pool on how long OPEC can avoid admitting they've peaked. I think I'll put my marker down on 2 more years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He's given us a clue.
Here's how I read the announcement:

He expects that by 2009 global oil depletion will have set in to such an extent that it wouldn't matter if KSA could raise their production - it wouldn't help anyway, so there will be no need to try.

Samsam Bakhtiari expects a 30+% decline in oil supply by 2020. There is nothing in the Saudi position to put that fear to rest. We're about done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Oil is worth more in the ground
than money in the bank.. I think besides oil depletion we also have the coming problem of export declines as oil producing nations realize they are sitting on their own futures.. Why should they have to EXPORT oil for other countries to waste!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Finding virtue
in necessity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. It makes no difference whether they can't or won't need to do so.
If it were true that demand was falling for whatever reason, it would be a good thing.

The world should be working proactively to ban oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. I smell BS.. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. That's a nice graph, isn't it? All the bullshit just goes sliding down that slope on the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. shhh, I stole it, dont tell
TOD of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. How's this for apropos?
Edited on Sat May-12-07 10:40 PM by IDemo
Fifty-Year Crude Oil Outlook - Saudi Aramco's Perspective

The requested resource does not exist.

Now they're even admitting the oil is 404!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yet more evidence that the gods have a sense of humour!
Granted, it's pretty black humour at times, but still, nothing is worse than serious gods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC