Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Turning "Takings" On Their Ear - Exxon Must Pay For Lost Recreation Opportunities Caused By Toxins

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 12:42 PM
Original message
Turning "Takings" On Their Ear - Exxon Must Pay For Lost Recreation Opportunities Caused By Toxins
NEWARK, New Jersey: A New Jersey appeals court has ordered Exxon Mobil Corp. to pay the state for lost recreational opportunities resulting from contamination at waterfront refineries it operated.

The decision Wednesday is a setback for Exxon Mobil, which had been working to clean sites in Linden and Bayonne since 1991. The state sued in 2004 after the company balked at its request to also pay for the loss of natural recreation opportunities, such as fishing and bird watching, due to pollution at the sites.

"This is an important victory for our environment and the people of New Jersey," state Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner Lisa P. Jackson said in a statement. "The appellate court's decision removes all doubt that responsible parties must compensate the public for the value, use and benefits lost because of injuries to the natural resources that rightfully belong to the people."

New Jersey officials declined to say how much they are seeking. Compensation could come from money and land, DEP spokeswoman Elaine Makatura said.

EDIT

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/06/business/NA-FIN-US-Exxon-Cleanup.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. EXXON-Mobile will give the same excuse they've been using
to avoid paying the damages from teh EXXON-Valdez oil spill.

They can't afford it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, watch them whine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. The law can be a 2 edged sword
which is what I told folks when Kelo v. New London was decided.

Since then, it's been used to stop a Walmart!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC