tsipple
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 10:20 AM
Original message |
Iraq: Trending Toward Vietnam-Level Bloodiness |
|
I pulled out my calculator and did some simple calculations. If we assume that 20 U.S. soldiers died today in Iraq and that about 50,000 U.S. soldiers died in the Vietnam War, and if you assume that 20 fatalities per day continues (and doesn't accelerate), then U.S. fatalities would equal Vietnam fatalities in just under 7 years.
The Vietnam War was longer.
|
bemildred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 10:35 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Vietnam took quite a while to ramp up, so to speak. |
|
What is striking here, so far, it the immediate short cut to the bloody guerilla/civil conflict. The conventional resistance was token. It makes sense if you think about it, why bother with fighing a conventional war you cannot win when you can save your assets for a guerilla/civil war where the table it tilted more in your direction?
|
tsipple
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Two Differences That *Might* Help |
|
1. Vietnam was resupplied by the Chinese and Soviets. Hopefully Iraq doesn't get as much resupply. (Fingers crossed on that one.)
2. Vietnam has a much higher population.
On the other hand, I don't think U.S. public opinion would support anywhere near 50,000 U.S. war dead in Iraq. The war rationale has disappeared in Iraq quicker than it did in Vietnam.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |