Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Strategic Deception

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 10:14 PM
Original message
Strategic Deception
The big papers are taking President Bush's Middle East speech seriously, so far. They've noted his rhetoric seems to challenge 50 years of symbiotic coddling of non-democratic Middle East regimes, justified up to now on the argument of pursuing our national interests. As Robin Wright of The Washington Post notes, there will be no further entertainment of the once-convenient notion of 'Islamic exceptionalism'—where Islam was assumed to be incompatible with democratic government and therefore excused from otherwise universal human and political rights standards.

Privately, many will point to the surreal moment in the speech, made November 6 at the National Endowment for Democracy, where he described the principles for "successful societies" with a list of everything his administration has done to weaken American democracy at home. Sadly, Bush’s double standards and Animal Farm rhetoric are no longer big news.

But the flaw in his argument—revealing an intentional deception—is.

The speech was ostensibly designed to reframe the twin post-conflict failures in Iraq and Afghanistan, using the signing of the $87 billion supplemental appropriation for Iraq as a backdrop. Bush dropped the "Global War on Terror," and placed both regions into the larger historical context of the "Global Democratic Revolution." He wants us to believe that his efforts in the Middle East and Southwest Asia are the logical extension of the historical force that toppled Fascism in World War II and Communism during the Cold War. If we were wondering what Condoleezza Rice was going to contribute now that she’s "in charge" of Iraq, the former Soviet historian has clearly delivered.

http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/9352
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an excellent article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good piece.
Unfortunately, there is no reason to think that the problem
will be resolved in a sensible way.

WRT Mr. Bush's speech: They are grasping for straws, notice that
they have no new ideas to solve the mess they have made. The
"smart weapons" and "revolution in military affairs" were supposed
to do the job, but they fell flat on their face in record time.
It's still the same old dumb explosion at the end and nothing is
going to fix that, any Iraqi with an RPG makes just as smart a
weapon as you could ask for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC