Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dispute remains over which NYC agency responsible...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 03:34 AM
Original message
Dispute remains over which NYC agency responsible...
for control of any future disaster:

New York Times

Roles in Disaster Cause Rift in City
By WILLIAM K. RASHBAUM
and MICHELLE O'DONNELL

Published: April 3, 2004


More than two and a half years after the World Trade Center attacks exposed weaknesses in New York City's emergency response system, the city still lacks what many experts say is the most basic and essential tool for handling disasters: a formal agreement governing which city agency would lead the response at the scene of any catastrophic accident or terrorist strike.

Indeed, documents and interviews show that the dispute over control of such scenes among the city's main emergency response agencies — the Police and Fire Departments and the Office of Emergency Management — remains profound.

An exchange of letters in January between the Police Department and the O.E.M., in fact, shows that the police insist that they should control virtually every major emergency. The police, saying they alone possess the necessary resources and expertise, cite intelligence that they say makes clear "that Al Qaeda and other related terrorist groups are planning to utilize WMD devices to attack New York City."

Therefore, if a chemical attack occurred in the city's subways tomorrow, rescuers — some of the best-trained and equipped in the nation — would flood the scene and work to save lives. They would be working, however, without an accepted command structure to coordinate the work of more than a dozen city agencies, including not only the Police and Fire Departments, but the Health Department and the Department of Environmental Protection....


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/03/nyregion/03COMM.html?hp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not even sure that's a good idea.
I think I favor some kind of redundancy, with more than one agency prepared to command.

We had many leaders killed the last time. We almost lost our mayor as well. People forget that Giuliani was trapped by the falling towers. We definitely lost his expensive command center.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC