Kenergy
(834 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-04 01:22 AM
Original message |
|
I'm puzzled by this talk of reinstating the draft... I went to Congress.org to see who sponsored S 89 and HR 163, and discovered a slew of Dem sponsors. No Repubs, just Dems. This has me puzzled. Why just Dems?
|
murielm99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-04 01:25 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I know Rangel did it to make a point. |
|
Only the poor are serving and dying in Iraq.
He wanted to see a little more fairness about who is called to serve in the military.
|
Kenergy
(834 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-04 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I get the picture. Thank you Muriel. (I'm about as sharp as a tennis ball sometimes :-)
|
Dirty Hippie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-04 02:31 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-21-04 02:32 AM by OhMyGod
that Rangel's bill does not need to pass for the draft to be reinstated.
The current draft can be reactivated.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |