Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scope of Iraq reconstruction scaling down, official says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:54 PM
Original message
Scope of Iraq reconstruction scaling down, official says
Scope of Iraq reconstruction scaling down, official says

By Shane Harris
sharris@govexec.com

The U.S. government is shifting gears in the multibillion-dollar reconstruction effort in war-torn Iraq, siphoning money away from large-scale projects that could take years to complete to smaller, more manageable projects that can show results in shorter time.

The shift away from large infrastructure projects, such as building electric plants, to smaller work, such as repairing existing facilities, is prompted in part by dangerous working conditions in Iraq, and indicates the difficulty U.S. officials have had in managing projects of enormous scale, said Robin Raphel, the State Department's coordinator for Iraq reconstruction.

But while the smaller projects may yield a more visible demonstration of progress--which U.S. officials hope will engender public good will--the shifting of money reflects a significant rethinking of how Iraq will be rebuilt and repaired.

"I think less will be done by the big design-and-build contractors than initially thought," Raphel said in an interview, referring to the kinds of companies that won the first round of contracts to build key facilities, such as power and water treatment plants, sewers, roads and oil production facilities. Among those firms were engineering giants Bechtel Corp. and Halliburton Co.

http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0105/011805h1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gotta put a good face the Bush legacy / travestry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. FACADE building...
Based on another thread, it sounds like the US and Britain are preparing for a speedy withdrawal from Iraq.

This symbolic rebuilding, which only provides the facade of reconstruction--is just deplorable. We should fix everything we broke and repair every building we demolished. No question.

We all want the war to end. However, we cannot just abandon these people and leave their country in ruins.

Doing cosmetic repairs and smaller projects will not help the Iraqi people--total reconstruction will--and it's the least they deserve.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. yes, but we should give the work to THEM, not to halliburton
but we ain't doing that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Scaling down? It never really started
Here's an article from last summer -- but, really, nothing has changed.

U.S. Funds for Iraq Are Largely Unspent
By Rajiv Chandrasekaran
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, July 4, 2004; Page A01

BAGHDAD, July 3 -- The U.S. government has spent 2 percent of an $18.4 billion aid package that Congress approved in October last year after the Bush administration called for a quick infusion of cash into Iraq to finance reconstruction, according to figures released Friday by the White House.

The U.S.-led occupation authorities were much quicker to channel Iraq's own money, expending or earmarking nearly all of $20 billion in a special development fund fed by the country's oil sales, a congressional investigator said.

Only $366 million of the $18.4 billion U.S. aid package had been spent as of June 22, the White House budget office told Congress in a report that offers the first detailed accounting of the massive reconstruction package.

Thus far, according to the report, nothing from the package has been spent on construction, health care, sanitation and water projects. More money has been spent on administration than all projects related to education, human rights, democracy and governance. <snip>

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26310-2004Jul3.html


In December and early January, Congress was falling all over itself to reallocate the unspent Iraq "reconstruction" money to tsunami relief.

It's a gigantic rip-off of Iraqi oil money for giant corporations, with the shills playin a friggin shell game in front for the benefit of the rubes ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonddad Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Totally botched
The US had a great opportunity to use patronage to maximum benefit with the money approved for rebuilding. They could have dolled out millions of dollars to Iraqi business for rebuilding, creating employment and job opportunities.

Instead, the money went to non-Iraqi companies.

What a complete waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC