Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iowans get it!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Procopius Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 09:42 PM
Original message
Iowans get it!
The Assault Weapons Ban: Straight Reauthorization v. Reauthorization and Strengthening :


http://www.ipgv.org/publications.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I believe your title "Iowans get it!" is incorrect. What you post as a
link is the opinions of a special interest group.

Do you have evidence that the majority of Iowans support a continued AWB?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ok
No, an Iowa anti-gun group gets it.


I see it for what it is also-------

"Though the bill Clinton signed purportedly targets only "assault weapons," the loose definitions and expansive goals of the antigun lobby will almost certainly lead to a vast expansion of weapons to be seized. And, as the experience of several states and New York City shows, the destruction of the Second Amendment via political demagoguery has already progressed much further than most Americans realize."

http://www.fff.org/freedom/0396d.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But the gunloons never get it.
As Michael Moore asks, since the 2nd Amendment only says "arms": 'Should everyone be able to own nuclear weapons?' (Now, remember that Moore is a life-long member of the NRA.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Procopius Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Notice that missles are restricted under the NFA of 1934
You wouldn't be able to run out and buy one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You can own a nuclear weapon if you really want one
There is no law against a civilian owning one. You'd have to come up with money to buy it, and comply with a whole bunch of permits and licenses to guarantee that you transport and store it safely.

I have no personal objection to you owning a nuke if you really want one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. There is no reason to have these guns on the street
and every reason to take them off...including the fact that voters WANT them off the street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. What is it with Michael Moore?
Is he some demigod to the anti-gun movement?

"Our leader and intellectual counselor, Michael Moore, says we should feel this way about guns..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Cry us a river, fly
Or you could compare him to some of the leading lights in the RKBA movement....like Ted Nugent...

...or Mary Rosh...

or Tom DeLay....

or John AshKKKroft...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Boo-hoo-hoo!!!
MrBenchly is right!!! How could i have been such a fool? His vast argumentative abilities finally showed me the error in my ways!

Tell me, Master Benchly, how shall I do your bidding? Let me be a tool for your hate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. You could actually
pay attention to issues once in a while instead of just regurgitating this stale NRA crap...

Or you could ask yourself what the hell you're doing on the same side as John AshKKKroft, Ted Nugent and Tom DeLay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yes master....
I am at your command.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Nevermind
Edited on Wed Sep-17-03 08:37 AM by Superfly
blah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1a2b3c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. that didnt make much sense
when you cant read what the other guy said. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1a2b3c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. You should read the definition of "arms"
Though i am sure someone already told you this. I am just posting as i read down the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. It would seem that...
...whoever drafted the AWB should be very embarassed for writing such a piss poor bill.

"Unfortunately, soon after the assault weapons ban took effect, gun manufacturers began circumventing the ban by making minor modifications to their assault weapons, renaming them, and marketing them as legal post-ban products. An example is the Colt Match Target Rifle, which is functionally identical to the Colt AR-15 that was banned by name in the 1994 assault weapons ban. Other gun manufacturers began producing clones of banned assault weapons. The Bushmaster XM-15 and Olympic Arms PCR-6 are nothing but clones of the AR-15.
The result is that in spite of the 1994 assault weapons ban, military-style, semiautomatic assault weapons are just as available today than they were prior to the 1994 ban. Gun manufacturers openly boast of their ability to evade the current ban."

If they couldn't predict that a few minor changes to a gun would make it 'legal' they must have been pretty stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. I think the net effect of the AWB was to increase the number of AWs
The feature ban spurred manufacturers to change their designs to make compliant weapons. The publicity given the subject aroused many peoples' curiousity. We Americans have a rebellious streak in our culture and sometimes buy or do things that are perceived as edgy if not outright forbidden.

The choices of configurations available among AR-15 clones today vastly outnumber those one could find in 1994.

Bushmaster Firearms offered just a few models back then. Look at their public catalog today:

http://www.bushmaster.com/shopping/weapons/

And their newest product line:

http://www.bushmaster.com/shopping/Carbon15/

You can thank the authors of the 1994 ban for forcing Bushmaster to stray from the "classic" A2 configuration. Of course many additional versions are available for law enforcement use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. And WHO owns Bushmaster?
Hmmmmmm? And what candidate does he support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC