Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wilmette Suspends Local Handgun Ban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:42 PM
Original message
Wilmette Suspends Local Handgun Ban
Wilmette Suspends Local Handgun Ban
NRA Files Suits In Chicago, Three Suburbs Challenging Gun Bans

POSTED: 2:47 pm CDT June 27, 2008
UPDATED: 6:39 pm CDT June 27, 2008

WILMETTE, Ill. -- Wilmette has suspended enforcement of its 19-year-old ordinance banning handgun possession in the wake of a U.S. Supreme Court decision that appears to invalidate such bans.

"The Law Department and the Police Department have suspended enforcement of the ordinance pending further review by the Village Board," Wilmette village attorney Tim Frenzer said Thursday. "Based on the decision today, at a minimum it calls into serious question the continued viability of the ordinance."

Frenzer said questions remain about how directly the court's decision will impact local gun laws in Wilmette and other parts of the country. Washington is not a state, and each state has its own legal language governing the right to bear arms.

"That aside, the opinion will require further review and discussion by the Village Board, but it's prudent at this point to suspend enforcement of it," Frenzer said.

Wilmette's law, enacted in 1989, levied fines of up to $750 for handgun possession and allowed the village to seek a judge's order to have seized weapons destroyed.


http://www.nbc5.com/news/16729972/detail.html



It will be interesting to see if after consideration, Wilmette reinstates their handgun ban.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like a prudent move indeed - I wish San Diego's government had that kind of smarts
Defending it in court in the wake of Heller could be very expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think it depends on how deep the pockets of the constituents are
I would guess that SF and Chi-town has a lot more tax revenue to waste fighting a loosing battle than does Wilmette, IL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Handguns are the tool of choice for 830,000 sworn LEO who do not have an inalienable RKBA. I see no
legal reason to deny handguns to law-abiding citizens now that SCOTUS has confirmed that we have an inalienable right to keep and bear arms and that right predated the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC