JFK was gunned down, and then Martin Luther King, Jr, and then Bobby Kennedy, I would say that at a minimum gun control has been on the minds of a good many Democrats, at least those Democrats who value human life.
Oh, and it's on Obama's mind too. From Yahoo News --> "Obama linked to gun control efforts."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080419/pl_politico/9722 And do check out this too, regarding Barack:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/630645/barak_obamas_gun_control_positions.html?cat=75Standing way far apart from Obama are the Republicans standing here:
You want to compare bans, do you? Don't compare bans where all citizens have to do to bypass the ban is take a subway to some other nearby location to easily get a gun (e.g., Washington, DC). That's no ban at all!!! Compare murder rates where guns are exceedingly rare throughout (e.g., Japan) to those where they're found everywhere (U.S. of A.). So now, Don, what country has the significantly higher murder rate, the USA or Japan???
You want to understand how gun control can reduce crime rates? Fine. I'll make it as simple for you as I can.
If no one has a gun, no one gets robbed by a gun, and no one gets murdered by a gun. Simple enough?
Noticed that you seem to be a firm believer in this "concealed carry" stuff. Well then, who draws his gun first,
the criminal with foreknowledge that a crime is going to be committed, or the law-abiding concealed-carry guy? And the gun's really not doing much good if one's hands are reaching for the sky (or a bullet is in one's back), all the while the gun is still concealed, right, Don?
Now people are, of course, perfectly free to stand with Dick Cheney and the NRA. This is something I would never do, but hey, that's just how I am, being brought up as a liberal. As for me, I'll take a route that let's say is a tad more progressive. Like gun-control Western Europe, with it's lower murder rates, or super-gun-control, Japan, with its miniscule murder rates.