Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why doesn't Howard Dean just come out and say the Assault Weapons Ban Suck

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
BallaFaseke Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 03:16 PM
Original message
Why doesn't Howard Dean just come out and say the Assault Weapons Ban Suck
?

Kerry and Gephardt are so desperate they are claiming Dean opposes the Assault Weapons Ban.

As governor he largely did.

He would kick GW's ass in a lot of states if he opposed AWB renewal. It's that simple.

I would vote for Dean ASAP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Beccause he wants to win
Most sane people do not want assault weapons on the street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juancarlos Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. most sane people
Most sane people realize that the AWB is meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Yeah, surrrrrrre.....
THAT's why the gun industry is spending millions to try and get rid of it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. And that's why
YOU keep blowing an ass gasket each time the topic comes up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:11 PM
Original message
Gee, fly...
I'm not the one weeping and crying because sane voters don't want you to have such dangerous toys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Gee, fly
Guess you'rte telling us there's no-one but assholes in the RKBA crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Pop! There you go again!
Another ass gasket meets its maker. Bench, you really need to control that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Gee, fly....
I'm only in danger of losing my wind due to excessive laughter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valarauko Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #30
41. "He laughs well who laughs last"
A Russian proverb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. You still have not produced any evidence to support that claim
Edited on Tue Nov-04-03 04:29 PM by slackmaster
When challenged in the past all you have done is to show that the NRA gives more money to Republican candidates than it does Democrats. That's a big fat "Duh!", and does not qualify as evidence that the gun industry is spending millions to make sure the ban goes away.

And there is no rational reason to believe that the gun industry would care one way or another unless their motivation is a personal preference for individual liberty.

The AW ban makes no difference to the gun industry. With the ban in place for the last 9+ years, sales of AWB-compliant (i.e. post-ban) weapons have been good. Expiration of the ban will make no difference to them. The ban in fact encouraged development of some configurations that have evolved into highly accurate, affordable weapons for match shooting. The gun makers will certainly continue to make what we now call "post-ban" weapons because they are very popular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Most sane people don't know an assault weapon from their elbow
Especially people who have never owned a gun but support the ban like scared little sheep because someone told them to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valarauko Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
40. Obviously, the definition of "sane" is
monopolised by the MMM.

What a pantload.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think we're going to see an emphasis on that issue.
I think the guns issue hurts us politically no matter what stand we take and no matter who the nominee turns out to be. It's a classic "wedge issue" that divides Democrat from Democrat, by social class and by region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BallaFaseke Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Exactly right
As a rural Dem I don't want my guns banned and I want more than 10 rounds when I go hunting or home defense.

If you don't want an assault weapon, DON'T BUY ONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I have a couple ideas
I have a couple ideas for Dean on this, but they rely on common sense and rationality on the part of voters, so they might not work:

1: Say he's opposed to the ban, and back it up with some hard research on how few so-called "assault" weapons are actually involved in violent crime. Say something about supporting gun control that works, not knee-jerk reactions.

Or

2: Weasel out of his previous opposition to the ban by claiming the federal ban as enacted only applies to certain weapons, whereas when he talked to the NRA in 1992 he was stating his opposition to a broader ban on all semi-automatics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. gun grabbers lose elections





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. I like Clark's position
Edited on Tue Nov-04-03 03:29 PM by MidwestTransplant
Own all the hand guns and hunting rifles you want. If you want an assault weapon "join the Army, we have tons of em."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BallaFaseke Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. But what about the magazine ban?
The gun banners think that is the best part of the Assault Weapons Ban.

Why should I be stuck with 10 rounds when cops get 15?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Why are you trying to outshoot cops?
Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Classic Straw Man
A desire to have ammunition capacity EQUAL to cops does not equate to trying to outshoot them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. And, similarly,
a desire to have more than the cops does not equate to trying to outshoot them. Having ammo does not one a criminal make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Two things.
One, I was asking BallaFaseke, not you.

Two, why make a specific comparison to a cop's ammo capacity if you're not trying to outshoot a cop? Why, otherwise, does it matter how many bullets a cop can have? If ten bullets isn't enough, just say ten bullets isn't enough. What do the cops have to do with it, if I accept your assumption that we're not talking about shooting at cops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Ummm...this is a F-O-R-U-M
a place where EVEYBODY comes together to post ideas.

Get used to it, babe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Choked on the second question, I see.
Edited on Tue Nov-04-03 04:26 PM by library_max
As for the first, I was trying to find out what a specific poster meant by a specific statement that poster made. I had the strange idea that maybe he would know more about what he meant than you would.

But you had to cry straw man. I was asking a question, not making a statement, so the straw man business is just a teensy bit of a stretch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. How many times can we say "strawman" in one post?
Let's see...

That must be your new word for the day. You have one of those "word power" desk calendars, right? What was yesterday's word?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Still can't deal with that second question, eh?
Edited on Tue Nov-04-03 04:28 PM by library_max
Your responses are getting increasingly lame. "Straw man" was Slackmaster's term, not mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Xcuse me?
Were you asking me or another poster? I don't want to impinge on your private conversation with somebody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valarauko Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
42. Reference to cops
Simple: Cops believe themselves to be in need of such devices, because they want the best and most efficient equipment to protect their life. They know that in stress situations people tend to shoot FAR worse than at the range, thus, a lot of rounds is needed.

We want that equipment too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. "We want that equipment too"
Fer whut? I have a basic idea of what a cop's job description is and the kind of situations they have to put themselves into on a daily basis. What exactly do you face that requires that kind of firepower? Not in your fantasies, now, but in reality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
44. Why should cops have MORE rights than the rest of the people?
I thought we were SUPPOSED to live in a country where EVERYBODY was held to the same standard...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. This doesn't make sense.
A doctor can write prescriptions. I can't. An attorney can practise law. I can't. All kinds of professions have "rights" not enjoyed by the general population because they also have education, training, certification, and insurance that the general population doesn't have.

In the case of cops, they ALSO have employment-related protection needs that you and I don't have. Cops have to account for each and every bullet they fire. Their firearms aren't a "right," they're part of the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Bullseye, library_max

Well-said.

(Thought I'd get my kudos in before the routine savaging from the Guns For Everybody crowd commences.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Actually, it seems to have shut them up.
Wonders never cease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BallaFaseke Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. Most cops suck at shooting
It doesn't take much to outshoot a cop who qualifies just 1-2 times a year.

I like to have as many rounds as I can when I pratice so I don't have to frequently reload.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
43. What a nifty paraphrasing of Himmler....
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withergyld Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. He wants it renewed
From his web page:
I believe the federal gun laws we have -- like the Brady Bill -- are important, and I would veto any attempt to repeal or gut them. The Assault Weapons Ban expires next year, and it should be renewed.
http://www.deanforamerica.com/site/PageServer?pagename=policy_statement_civilrights_sensiblegunlaws
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BallaFaseke Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. But is that just to get elected?
It seems to me Dean knows the AWB is a farce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withergyld Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. I don't know
More from his web page:
I don’t think we need a lot of new federal laws. But we do need to do a few things at the federal level, like requiring Insta-Check on all retail and gun show sales. We also must do a better job of enforcing the laws on the books. President Bush promised to be tough in enforcing gun laws, but his Administration has prosecuted only about 2% of all gun crimes and they are virtually ignoring 20 of the 22 major federal gun laws on the books. That is an abysmal record, and as President, I’d make tough enforcement a reality, not just political rhetoric.

After that, I would let the states decide for themselves what, if any, additional gun safety laws they want. Just as we resist attempts by President Bush to dictate to the states how we run our school systems and what kind of welfare programs to have, we need to resist attempts to tell states how to deal with guns beyond existing federal law and fixing a few loopholes and problems.


http://www.deanforamerica.com/site/PageServer?pagename=policy_statement_civilrights_sensiblegunlaws
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Excellent job of finessing the issue.
Dean's a smart guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upfront Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
29. Because
We don't need assult weapons. Give me a pump Rem. any day. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1a2b3c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
31. Politics
If a politician came out and said the ban sucks without saying it needs to be stronger and ban more guns, the uniformed masses wouldnt shit their pants and not vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BallaFaseke Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. The uniformed masses do not vote
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 07:37 PM by BallaFaseke
Hence the Repukes have been in control of Congress since 1994- the year the AWB was passed.

By continually supporting this dumb arse law we have NOT REGAINED CONTROL.

Coincidence? NO!

The Repuke gun owners vote and vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1a2b3c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. The uniformed masses do vote
and they have no idea what the AWB is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BallaFaseke Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Which is why Bush can go around claiming he supports it
I bet the NRA still endorses him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1a2b3c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Of course
He has an R behind his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. The NRA hasn't announced who it's supporting for Pres in '04
And it won't until after the Democratic Party announces a candidate.

Given that Bush's position is very similar to Howard Dean's, if Dean gets the nod the NRA will probably endorse GWB because it tends to prefer incumbents in a draw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BallaFaseke Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Dean opposes lawsuit pre-emption
The NRA has called Dean "schizophrenic".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funkyflathead Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
39. It's popularly supported
It maybe full of loopholes and worthless but most folks see it as common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC