Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU defends teacher suspended for holding gun in Facebook photo.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:59 PM
Original message
ACLU defends teacher suspended for holding gun in Facebook photo.
Edited on Sun Feb-15-09 12:00 AM by benEzra
http://www.wkowtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=9802250&nav=menu1362_2

ACLU of Wisconsin: School should allow teacher to pose with rifle on Facebook

A Beaver Dam Middle School teacher, Betsy Ramsdale, should not have been put on administrative leave simply because of a photo on Facebook showing her training a rifle at the camera. While school safety is of paramount importance, public school teachers do not lose their right to free expression when they are not working.

The context of the photo, the whole Facebook page, is important to understand before taking action against a teacher, who happens to be a gun enthusiast. Media accounts of the photo do not indicate any additional grounds for concern. Beaver Dam School District superintendent Donald Childs is reported to be unaware of any sinister intent.

"Absent any evidence that the teacher poses a threat, the district should not over-react to the sight of a gun in one of their employee's hands," said Chris Ahmuty, Executive Director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Wisconsin today.

Good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm a proud gun-grabber, but I don't think this is reasonable . . .
Edited on Sun Feb-15-09 12:52 AM by MrModerate
on the school's part. I can't get to the photo, but from descriptions it seems (maybe) tasteless but otherwise unremarkable.

I will say these two things:

1) Overreaction seems to be school boards' middle name. Across the country you continually hear of wildly disproportionate responses to perfectly legal and reasonable behavior, as well as to behavior that is understood to be unthreatening when coming from 6-year-olds where it wouldn't from 26-year-olds. Is there something in the training or character of people drawn to the education field that makes them such goofuses?

2) Facebook is *not* private. One forgets that at one's peril. If you're going to do something stupid-but-not-illegal, don't expect to escape notice just because you posted it on a social networking site that any one of 5 billion people might see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guntard Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. "Zero tolerance" = "Zero judgement"
It's a new educational paradigm!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Here's the pic



Looks like a shotgun, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Um she should never point a firearm at ANYBODY
Edited on Sun Feb-15-09 12:36 AM by tularetom
She should be suspended for violating one of the most basic rules of gun safety.

Good for the ACLU for defending her right to be photographed with a gun.

But shame on her for being stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. who is to say that she didnt put the camera on timer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Even the cheapest cameras these days have delay timers and tripod mounts,
or you can just set the camera on a bookshelf. And based on the fuzziness, those stills could even be frame captures from a video clip.

I've shot a couple of point-at-the-camera .avi clips to evaluate the brightness of a Surefire G3 LED mounted on my AK in low light. Used a tripod. You don't have to violate Rule Two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Probably one of those ball-shaped webcams that sit on a monitor n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
57_TomCat Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Looks like it was placed on the floor....
and she was in the prone position when photographed. BIG honking barrel! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. "Good for the ACLU for defending her right to be photographed with a gun."

If only that was what she had done, and what the ACLU has done.

The photograph doesn't depict her "with a gun" any more than the photographs from Abu Ghraib depicted people "with other people".

The photograph depicted her training a firearm on the viewer of the photograph.

Shame on you for being disingenuous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. It's a gun, not a basilisk. It won't shoot through the intertubes.
(See Charles Stross' Hugo Award-winning "Concrete Jungle" for the SCORPION STARE reference...)

Absent a threatening message to go with the low-res webcam photo, there is no threat to anyone,
just some control freak school admin having a moral panic moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost in CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is almost beyond stupid.
What possible objection could there be.

There is nothing illegal about owning a gun.

If a teacher has a photo of themselves smoking on the internet should they be fired as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. Gun ownership is now in the context of prohibitionist politics...
Once prohibitionism infects an "issue," then blanket bans, arbitrary punishment and shaming become the order of the day. Public schools are notorious (even proud) of being the submissive conduit for behavioral engineers demanding folks comport with their way of being. The sport of such suppressive activities is indicated by the District's super who maintains he is unaware of any sinister intent; all the better so the public can puzzle over why someone is in the stocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good for ACLU of Wisconsin! I wonder if ACLU National approves? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indy Lurker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. She wasn't terminated
Simply put on administrative leave.

If a teacher shot a bunch of students and it was then discovered that the school was aware of a picture of the teacher such as this was around but the school didn't investigate, the school would be blamed.

Once the teacher is deemed not to be a threat to herself or others, she should be allowed to return to school.


First amendment rights do not extend to protection from employers, (except for some union related activities) Had the teacher been spouting racist neo-Nazi speech, she would be terminated immediately.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nitrogen76 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. Notice it was the ACLU that defended her, NOT the NRA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC