Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Benchley, a Q for U

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
juancarlos Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 02:52 PM
Original message
Benchley, a Q for U
"The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism — ownership of government by an individual, by a group or by any controlling private power."--FDR


I found the above as your signature line on 11-13-03. As we know, FDR signed the GCA 1934 into law, which required a tax stamp of $200 to transfer a FA weapon. However, that has really little to do with the question I wish to ask. If fascism were to rear it's ugly head, what would you do to fight back? Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems to me that you are against the private ownership of firearms. If the people were to have no arms, what is to stop the government from becoming tyrannical?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
An appropriate question for all gun grabbers. We only truly have democracy if government fears the people.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gee....
I can;t think of a better illustration of FDR's warning than the currrent disgraceful attempt by the GOP to protect the corrupt gun industry from liability for its actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juancarlos Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Too bad your answer had nothing to do with the question
please try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jhfenton Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You should really get some new lines. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Why bother....
This RKBA crap is so old it has cobwebs on it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valarauko Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Cry me a river, Mr. B
I'll cry a river for you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juancarlos Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I'm sorry
Edited on Thu Nov-13-03 04:17 PM by juancarlos
that any answers you might give run the risk of exposing the falsity of your positions. Or do you just not know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. And I'm laughing my butt off.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juancarlos Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. way to appear credible!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juancarlos Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Why are you afraid to answer the following?
"The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism — ownership of government by an individual, by a group or by any controlling private power."--FDR


I found the above as your signature line on 11-13-03. As we know, FDR signed the GCA 1934 into law, which required a tax stamp of $200 to transfer a FA weapon. However, that has really little to do with the question I wish to ask. If fascism were to rear it's ugly head, what would you do to fight back? Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems to me that you are against the private ownership of firearms. If the people were to have no arms, what is to stop the government from becoming tyrannical?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Hand us a BIG laugh
"If fascism were to rear it's ugly head"
You mean like that pushed by your fellow NRA life member John AshKKKroft and his dimwitted drunk fuehrer, the NRA's favorite president ever?

Like I said, there's no better illustration of what FDR was warning about than the GOP putting the corrupt gun industry beyond the reach of liability laws. And the "gun rights" dimwits who are always pissing their pants over "the government" are cheering that bit of fascism all the way.

But then, it wasn't a gun control rally where armed morons were actually parading in public wearing Nazi uniforms, was it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Is that your "Word of the Week"
Last week, it was painting every gun owner as a "Racist". This week, is it going to be the same, substituting "Fascist" instead?

What's next?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhfenton Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The gun industry
Yes, I'm appalled! How dare the gun industry actually manufacture and sell safe and functional firearms in compliance with federal and state laws! Let's sue!

And after that, we can sue Ford because a drunk driver used one of their pickups to kill a teenager! It's Ford's fault that the truck could be driven -- poorly -- by an intoxicated driver. Ford should include a mysterious, non-existant high-tech device in every vehicle that prevents its operation by an intoxicated driver. If we can put a man on the moon, Ford can put a mysterious, non-existant high-tech device in every car!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC