Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Typo in Law Establishes Mandate to Lock Gun-Toting Train Passengers in Boxes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:58 PM
Original message
Typo in Law Establishes Mandate to Lock Gun-Toting Train Passengers in Boxes
Because of a typo, President Obama signed a bill into law Wednesday that requires passengers who carry firearms aboard Amtrak be locked in boxes for their journey.


Harry Houdini made a career escaping from locked boxes. So did David Copperfield and Doug Henning.

And now, add to that list Amtrak passengers packing heat in their luggage?

It may sound absurd. But President Obama signed a bill into law Wednesday that requires passengers who carry firearms aboard Amtrak be locked in boxes for their journey.

It's a mistake in the law's wording. But for now, the clerical error is the law of the land.

The bill text was correct when the House approved the legislation last week. The Senate followed suit Sunday, but somewhere along the line, the language that referred to putting the guns in locked boxes morphed into stuffing "passengers" into locked boxes.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/16/typo-law-establishes-mandate-lock-gun-toting-train-passengers-boxes/?test=latestnews

So are drinks and sandwiches provided?
Posted just for fun!!

Oneshooter
Livin in Texas

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Finally, Obama has passed a law I can support!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
logjon Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. that's stupid
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 03:04 AM by logjon
why would you support locking law-abiding gun owners in a box?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. You'll find that a lot of people...
...tend to turn "stupid" when it comes to the issue of firearms, in no small part due to the large amount of disinformation they've been fed by organizations like that Brady Campaign.

Oh, and welcome to the DU :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, at least they can shoot breathing holes onto the boxes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. I want to see this enforced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. +1
As written. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greennina Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why do you believe Faux News?
What's your agenda? Obviously Obama would never sign such a thing. Why would you say that he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taurus145 Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I found the text of the bill, you can, too
The report is accurate.

No. I will not do your work for you. Find the text for yourself, then you can't impugn the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I suppose Common Dreams and the Brady Campaign are lying also.
WASHINGTON - December 10 - Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, today commented on new legislative language that would require Amtrak passengers to give at least 24 hours' notice prior to checking luggage containing firearms and ensure that such checked luggage is secure and inaccessible to other passengers:

"It is dangerous for Congress to dictate to Amtrak how to handle guns on passenger trains. Trying to micromanage Amtrak security is inappropriate at best, reckless at worst. But now that Congress has decided to allow passengers to be able to transport firearms in checked luggage on trains operated by Amtrak, at least their negotiators have responded to some of the safety concerns raised by gun violence prevention advocates.


http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/12/10-11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angleae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. The text in question.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/C?c111:./temp/~c111vdJwl5

Sec. 159. (a) Amtrak Security Evaluation- No later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, Amtrak, in consultation with the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration), shall submit a report to Congress that contains--

(1) a comprehensive, system-wide, security evaluation; and

(2) proposed guidance and procedures necessary to implement a new checked firearms program.

(b) Developement and Implementation of Guidance and Procedures-

(1) In General- Not later than one year after the enactment of this Act, Amtrak, in consultation with the Assistant Secretary, shall develop and implement guidance and procedures to carry out the duties and responsibilities of firearm storage and carriage in checked baggage cars and at Amtrak stations that accept checked baggage.

(2) Scope- The guidance and procedures developed under paragraph (1) shall--

(A) permit Amtrak passengers holding a ticket for a specific Amtrak route to place an unloaded firearm or starter pistol in a checked bag on such route if--

(i) the Amtrak station accepts checked baggage for such route;

(ii) the passenger declares to Amtrak, either orally or in writing, at the time the reservation is made or not later than 24 hours before departure, that the firearm will be placed in his or her bag and will be unloaded;

(iii) the firearm is in a hard-sided container;

(iv) such container is locked; and

(v) only the passenger has the key or combination for such container;

(B) permit Amtrak passengers holding a ticket for a specific Amtrak route to place small arms ammunition for personal use in a checked bag on such route if the ammunition is securely packed--

(i) in fiber, wood, or metal boxes; or

(ii) in other packaging specifically designed to carry small amounts of ammunition; and

(C) include any other measures needed to ensure the safety and security of Amtrak employees, passengers, and infrastructure, including--

(i) in fiber, wood, or metal boxes; or

(ii) in other packaging specifically designed to carry small amounts of ammunition; and

(c) Definitions-

(1) For purposes of this section, the term `checked baggage' refers to baggage transported that is accessible only to select Amtrak employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I don't see any such typo. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Remember that the typo was not on the version that came out of congress
It was on the version that the president signed, according to the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. That would mean the version that becomes law won't have the typo.
Either he'll have to re-sign the version Congress passed, the version Congress passed will become law without a new signature after a certain amount of time, or the courts will declare that he meant to sign Congress's version, but any way you slice it the law is Congress's version. The President can't do anything to change the text of the law at signing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. oops, wrong place (n/t)
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 12:03 PM by benEzra
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Since there are no "gun toting passengers" in the scenario at all,
it seems to me that the headline writer didn't bother to read the law too closely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. That's not the only problem with the article
The rules to allow Amtrak passengers to carry weapons with them are new. Airline passengers have long been permitted to transport weapons in checked luggage. But Amtrak banned firearms from its trains after Sept. 11.

As you rightly note, benEzra, the law does not allow passengers to carry weapons with them; it allows them to have firearms transported in their checked luggage, which is in a separate train car, inaccessible to the passengers.

Second, the rules are not, strictly speaking, new. As the article itself alludes, firearms were permitted on Amtrak in checked luggage prior to 2001, so what this amendment does is restore the status quo ante.

Frankly, it's not very well written.

I do have note that various Google searches have failed to turn up any corroboration to this story, causing me to doubt its veracity. I'll reserve judgment for the moment, but I won't be surprised if it turns out this story bollocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. Fox "News" is not a legitimate source. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Even if they are correct?
Admitedly, doesn't happen often, but heck, if they manage to state that 2+2=4, they aren't wrong just because they are FoxNews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Then we can find a non-Fox link for the story. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
20.  Go ahead, find it and post the same info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Not my job. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. The moral equivalence of sticking fingers in your ears and yelling "Neener, neener, neener!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Here, let me google that for you...
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 11:33 PM by Ian David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. While I do agree that there's always reason to question faux news stories.
I think your going a little overboard with it here, Ian. Take a look at Euromutts posting for a better example of expressing distrust of faux news while also remaining open minded and rational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Well, thank you....
But that was not at all the point.

Have a good weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
28. A train car is kind of like a box, and I'm sure they lock the doors while the train
is in motion, so this should work out OK... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC