Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Virginia Gun control opponents hope to reshape handgun laws

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 01:05 PM
Original message
Virginia Gun control opponents hope to reshape handgun laws

In addition to attempting to repeal the one-gun-a-month law, several other gun related bills are being proposed.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/local/Gun-control-opponents-hope-to-reshape-handgun-laws-8697689-80433647.html

Del. Mark Cole, R-Fredericksburg, has filed legislation that would legalize bringing guns into a courthouse "when the courthouse is being used for non-judicial activities," according to an online summary.

Del. Bob Marshall, R-Manassas, is proposing that full-time faculty members at state universities be allowed to carry concealed handguns into the classroom, provided they have a permit.

Del. Charles Carrico, R-Galax, authored a bill that would allow permits for concealed handguns to be renewed through the mail. Another of Carrico's bills would change the penalty for bringing a firearm onto school property from a felony to a misdemeanor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. More idiocy in VA.
Unfortunately, VA isn't the only state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Nice drive-by.
Heaven forbid you'd actually, you know, have a RATIONAL argument to make on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Guns in courthoses for "non-judicial events," guns on state university campuses.
Only an idiot wouldn't see the problems. Let me make one reference: Virginia Tech.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The "No Guns" rule at Virginia Tech certainly was successful in stopping Cho, wasn't it.
That was sarcasm for those who may need to be informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thats the best example that works against your position.

lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Only an idiot wouldnt know that VA Tech is a "gun free zone"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. Why are guns prohibited in courthouses?
Same reason they're prohibited in police stations, county jails and penitentiaries: to prevent them from being used in facilitating the escape of a detainee. But if court's not in session, and there are no detainees in the holding cells awaiting trial or transportation, then that ceases to be a rationale.

Personally, I have no issue checking my handgun, multitool, etc. at the courthouse (Washington state law requires courthouses to provide secure storage for items not allowed into the courthouse) because it's a secure area, with metal detectors and all that; it's not just a "gun free zone" in which the only protection consists of any potential shooter's willingness to obey the signs (and we saw how well that worked at Virginia Tech, and Northern Illinois, and Trolley Square Mall and Westroads Mall...).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. Wasn't it legal to carry at VT well before Cho's rampage?
I know the law was changed recently to make it illegal. Perhaps Cho read about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorfle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. And how well did that work out at Virginia Tech?
Clue: 32 people died when someone ignored the laws concerning firearms and not a single person obeying the law had the means to resist him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. They need to change the guns in restaurants
where alcohol is served. The 51% rule is a good standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Is the current law for restaurants causing problems? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katya Mullethov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. If alcohol is so apt to cause violence ,
Why are they still selling it ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Hee-hee, touche.
Personally, I blame forks. No-one needs those pointy devils-tools to consume nourishment. Heck, anyone could just twitch and stab themselves in the toungue, or their neighbor in the eye...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hard2believe Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Like the NRA
and all the other groups that strong lobby presence in Washington, the alcohol groups are just as strong.

I would ask you; is a person with a gun more apt to use it while drinking or when sober?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Most states, if you are drinking, you are not allowed to be in immediate physical possesion...
Edited on Tue Jan-05-10 02:57 PM by PavePusher
of a firearm.

And the very few states where you can legally drink and carry, it does not seem to be a statistically significant problem.


Apparently the overwhelmingly vast majority of gun owners are peaceful and lawabiding, whether intoxicated or sober.


But, to directly address your question: I don't know if a person with a gun is more apt to use it when intoxicated, but I am sure they would be more likely to use it unsafely or illegaly. Just as with any other object. Drunks and cars have a bad safety record. I've cut myself more often when using tools slightly (or more...) buzzed than when stone sober. (Duuuuh, D'oh!)

When I drink, I don't touch a firearm, unless someone is crashing through a window at me. So, no data there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taurus145 Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Responsible gun owners
never mix alcohol and firearms in any way.

Target shooting is a big thing at my house - paper, clays, pins, you name it. The guns go in the safe before the alcohol comes out - even if it's a single beer or glass of wine with a meal. No exceptions. Same rules in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katya Mullethov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. There is no llimit to what a drunk might do
Other than his impaired coordination . Up to and including shoot you ,stick you,or dick you .

One reason I avoid such places like the pox , and it isnt the bar so much as the parking lot on the way out .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. Since you asked, I am more apt to use one while sober. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
24. I wouldn't say it's because of "the alcohol lobby" as much as individuals who value the choice.
Edited on Wed Jan-06-10 11:52 AM by benEzra
The control freaks DID manage to outlaw alcohol for a while, don't forget.

Alcohol kills around 100,000 a year according to the CDC, but we accept that, with some restrictions on alcohol misuse, because the social cost of banning alcohol (loss of freedom/police state environment, rise of organized crime, vastly increased trafficking and violence, pushing the market toward more distilled forms) was higher than the cost of having it legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Not really
I don't like taking my coat off, exposing my gun when I go into a eating joint. Scares the kiddies and all that. It doesn't bother me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I see.
It (O.C.) doesn't scare people here, but it isn't allowed in restaurants/bars that serve (C.C. only). (AZ, for the record.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
26. That is certainly a backwards law.
Guns are allowed where alcohol is served, but the gun has to be exposed. That just doesn't make any sense. There is nothing positive about showing the drunks your gun. There is nothing positive about leaving your gun in your car in the parking lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. As I said, right after the election..
Edited on Tue Jan-05-10 05:25 PM by virginia mountainman
The pro gun side, PICKED UP 11 Seats in the Virginia House of Delegates. We now have is a veto-proof margain...With several votes to spare....

Let me let some of you in on a FACT in Virginia Law, I, with my CCW (CHP in Virginia) can carry on collage grounds, school rules ONLY APPLY TO STUDENTS.... Virginia Tech and UVA are state ran institutions, as such, they have very limited ability to control guns on state property.

I really liked this line in the article..

Proponents of stronger gun laws have become much more vocal and focused since the 2007 Virginia Tech massacre and are likely to oppose the measures alongside many legislators.


LOL yea, you would get "much more vocal and focused" when your getting your nuts crushed. They can oppose all they want, but the fact remains, their side, NEVER "gets the votes", and legislators know that their first vote for them, has a high chance of being among their last vote..

Gun Rights proponets, DELIVER...Anti-Gun Rights people dither...

Truly, I ramain...

Virginia Mountainman

Dedicated to getting Virginia, F-Rated by the Brady Campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefflrrp Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Here here VAmountainman.
Fuck the Brady Campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. That's not what he meant...
But I'm sure you knew that.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC