|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
OttavaKarhu (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 06:05 PM Original message |
Man jailed for wife's guns/Bremerton WA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneshooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. If she can prove ownership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 06:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Nope. Read the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taurus145 (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 12:52 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. I'n so happy that you were there to confirm that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 01:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
19. no, he doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. Just confiscate the guns. No reason to incarcerate this man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OttavaKarhu (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 07:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. The guns are legally owned by his wife. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 09:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Please explain how someone who is married to someone who can't own guns can have guns in the house. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taurus145 (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 12:49 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. You think she should lose her rights because of his issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 01:25 AM Response to Reply #8 |
20. imo, he shouldn't be. but the law differs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. Sounds like a person who took a big risk with an American jury- and lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 06:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Damn, you ALMOST made it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 06:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Oh, and try giving this a read through before you decide to post again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OttavaKarhu (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 06:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Why should he have taken the deal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 07:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. He was guilty UNDER THE LAW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-08-10 11:54 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Maybe, as you so often claim, the law is bad and should be changed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OttavaKarhu (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 04:04 AM Response to Reply #9 |
24. I trust we'll be seeing about that in appeal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 07:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Hopefully, a good appeal will be made. This is unfair... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 08:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. In a society ruled by irrational fear- fairness & proportionality aren't virtues held in high esttem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eqfan592 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 09:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Interesting insights about your nation, depakid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-08-10 10:57 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Which is why I hope he gets a good lawyer and appeals... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taurus145 (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 03:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. The irrational fear lies with you and Australian lawmakers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 01:30 AM Response to Reply #10 |
23. this wasn;'t a "strict liability " offense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 01:30 AM Response to Reply #7 |
22. the issue is the REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON, which is the legislator's fault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 01:27 AM Response to Reply #3 |
21. the prosecutor DID use discretion in offering a no jail deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC