Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UPDATE: Explusion overturned of student that had hunting rifle in car off-campus

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 02:15 PM
Original message
UPDATE: Explusion overturned of student that had hunting rifle in car off-campus
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 02:17 PM by rd_kent
Thanks to aikoaiko for finding this.



REASON has prevailed here. Too bad REASON was ignored in the first place.......
-----------------------------------

Expulsion of Willows High student with shotguns near campus overturned
hsangree@sacbee.com http://www.sacbee.com/latest/story/2481590.html
Published Friday, Jan. 22, 2010

A Willows High School student who was expelled for having firearms in his pickup that was parked near the school will be reinstated and have the disciplinary action expunged from his record.

That ruling was made this morning by the Glenn County Board of Education acting on an appeal filed by Gary Tudesko. The hearing was open to the public at the request of Tudesko's parents.

Board President Judy Holzapfel, reading from a written version of the board's decision, said that in expelling Tudesko, the Willows Unified School District exceeded its jurisdiction based on acts "that did not occur on school grounds or at a school activity off of school grounds."

The Oct. 26 incident occurred a few days after the start of waterfowl hunting season in an area where duck hunting is a major pastime. Tudesko said he was returning from a morning hunt and did not have time to take the shotguns home without being late for school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Money and Votes speak loudly.
The NRA and the California Rifle and Pistol Association were involved. It would have been real expensive for the school board to fight a lawsuit.

Further, it would have been expensive in votes. Duck hunting is popular there, and school board officials must answer to the voters. Also, lots of other parents would be justly concerned about what other off-campus events the school may want to claim juristiction over.

The principal is upset that he got overruled. Screw him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The student will have a target ]on his back until he graduates
Educrats are like that. Defy them and you are in many ways toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep. He's a senior. It is only for a few months.
The flip side is that there was so much media attention on him that if anything is done to him now, even if justified, it will look like petty revenge. The educrats have to walk on eggshells too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I think that principal got a lesson on Second Amendment rights.
and the application of commonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. This really is good news!



Let's hope the little feller keeps his nose clean, studies hard, and graduates to bigger and better things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks again for the update. I gave you credit for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. thanks. but no credit is needed, I saw it first on CNNHeadline News.
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 03:37 PM by aikoaiko

Even they were enthusiastic about the student's vindication.

So often we never hear about what happens after an appeal.

Zero tolerance policies are idiotic.


eta: And you are correct, this news deserves its own thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks for the update. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Then they should have overturned the "Bong Hits for Jesus" ruling, too.
No way is it right that schools are allowed to shred the FIRST Amendment for their students while off grounds, and get blocked from abusing the SECOND, just because five Supreme Court justices only love one of the first ten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. i totally agree
that case was egregious.

kind of like how scalia espouses state's rights etc. EXCEPT with medical mj. all of a sudden, the COMMERCE CLAUSE applies to people growing MJ in their own backyard for their own consumption pursuant to state prescription?

get fucking real

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Well, this was the Glenn Co. Board of Education, not the SCOTUS
Not that I disagree with you. I think the power that schools have accorded themselves (admittedly at the urging of a few too many parents who want the world to be made of Nerf) could stand to be rolled back a considerable distance; at the very least, to the boundaries of school property. Moreover, we could also do with some acknowledgment that minors do have some measure of civil liberties that government institutions--such as public schools--are bound to respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Agreed, but the locals "cleaned up" this mess, first (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. Common sense!
I hope those zero tolerance goons got a good dressing down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC