Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Preliminary approval for carrying concealed weapon without permit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 08:59 PM
Original message
Preliminary approval for carrying concealed weapon without permit
What could possibly go wrong?


-snip-
Currently, carrying a concealed weapon in the state without a permit is a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $2,500.

By eliminating the permit requirement, Arizonans no longer would have to undergo background checks and take training classes to carry hidden guns.

http://www.azfamily.com/outbound-feeds/yahoo-news/Preliminary-approval-for-carrying-concealed-weapon-without-permit-88963872.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Would that mean that a person from Arizona could come into my..
relatively gun free neighborhood in New Jersey carrying a gun? Are you serious? If you people want to shoot each other at Starbucks in your own state, be my guest.

Forcing your guns on people who don't want them could turn out to be a really bad idea for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorfle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No.
All this law under consideration would do is allow citizens in Arizona to carry a concealed weapon without a permit. Vermont has similar laws.

This has nothing to do with New Jersey.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cowman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Don't worry
it only applies to AZ residents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Get a grip.
This only affects people within the borders of Arizona. The really scary part is that you could then come here and conceal your weapon without a permit for the duration of your stay. Oh, the horrors! I wouldn't trust a New Jerseyite with a gun as far a I could throw 'em.

Oddly enough, the same has been the law in Alaska for a number of years, and in Vermont since the founding of the nation. Neither state has nearly as much of a crime problem as your "relatively gun free <state of> New Jersey", so quit the drama-queen act.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. LOL..."Gun Free neighborhood in New Jersey"....
ROFLMAO!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. "..relatively gun free neighborhood" means they don't open carry.
I've got family in Jersey, and that got me laughing too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Extraterritorial rights are kind of out of fashion
Edited on Thu Mar-25-10 04:07 AM by Euromutt
As a U.S. citizen visiting Thailand, for example, you are not exempt from a law that prohibits a certain activity in Thailand (e.g. criticizing the king) even though it's not illegal back home.

Similarly, if you're a resident of one state, you are not exempt from laws of other states while in those states. To compare, California does not recognize any other state's concealed carry permits, and does not issue permits to non-residents, so there is no way for a private citizen not resident in California to legally carry concealed in California, no matter how many different states that person is licensed to carry in.

ETA: the worst shooting incident that ever occurred at a Starbucks was in Washington DC in 1997 (long before Heller), when three employees were murdered in a botched armed robbery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Used to be a Jersey Boy...
I did not love it, so I left it.

I have to admit, the law has done a very good job at keeping the guns out of people's hands. They have simple rules in NJ as far as CCW goes.
Here is a list of who can and cannot get a CCW in NJ...

CAN get a CCW
Police
Friends of the Police
Relatives of the Police
Judges
Friends of Judges
Relatives of Judges
Council Members
Friends of Council Members
Relatives of Council Members
Very Wealthy White People

MIGHT Be able to get a CCW
Private Investigators (PI friend of mine spent over $4,000 in legal fees to get the permit)
Really Really Wealthy Black People, being a celebrity helps
Wealthy White People
Personal Security (Is easier if they work for Very Wealthy White People)

CANNOT get a CCW
Average Income White People with Perfectly Clean Criminal Records
Black People regardless of Clean Criminal Records and Income Level.
Any other minority group
Me

If you want a gun... All you need is about 1/2 an hour and about $300. None of that pesky paperwork or background checks.



Gun laws in the state are not the only issue that the state has with elitism. Education, construction, health services, ect... Are all areas where there is a huge black line drawn between the "haves" and the "have nots".

New Jersey, the state tree is an orange road cone, state bird is the yellow-backed rubber-necker.

New Jersey, brought to you by your friends at The Mob™ NLC.

Am I bitter? Perhaps. Will I ever return? NEVAR!!!

You can keep your "relatively gun free neighborhood(s)". It seems to be working out well in Camden. 4x worse than Philly. There must be some sort of magical powers in the Delaware River that keeps the crime rate 4x lower on one side than the other. Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. does it include felons?
Those with PPOs and pissed off wife in middle of divorce? What next, no driver license?

I'm sure there must be some catches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Of course it does not include felons.
This stuff is very easy to look up, you know.

You can start on the Arizona page of opencarry.org.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Federal law takes care of the felons, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. If you can't legally possess the gun, you can't legally carry it
Thus, persons prohibited from owning a firearm under federal (and possibly state) law, such as convicted felons, persons adjudicated "mentally deficient," convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors or subject to TROs/PPOs will not be able to legally carry, for the very simple reason they can't legally possess a firearm at all.

Kind of obvious when you think about it, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvccd1000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. Mis-stated subject line in OP
Should have read, "Preliminary approval for untucking shirt or putting on a jacket when the evening cools off."

Arizona is already an open carry state. Any non-prohibited possessor (felon, etc.) can already openly carry a holstered firearm with no registration, no permit, no license, no fee, no government "permission slip."

The only thing these bills would do is allow me to put on a jacket if the weather cools off.

FYI, for those of you worried about the lack of a permit, the permit system is still in place and permits would be available for those who would like them for things like:
- additional training on the laws
- reciprocity with other states that recognize Arizona CCWs
- bypassing the NCIS background check when purchasing a firearm from a FFL
- carrying concealed in an establishment that serves alcohol
- receiving your permission slip from the government to exercise your "rights"




PS - to answer the OP's question, "What could possibly go wrong?" I'd say not much more than currently goes wrong with our "no permit/no registration" open carry laws. What were you expecting to go wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Oh Dear Gaawd.....!!
It... It'll turn into... Vermont! Or, or... Alaska...!

You know, where the blood runs in the streets and they have to hose down the sidewalks every weekend... Or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Don't forget the massive overtime requirements
For fire departments to hose that blood down, and the resulting tax increases to pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SsevenN Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. OMG the horror!
Edited on Thu Mar-25-10 10:08 AM by SsevenN
Permitless carry?!?!?!?!? I mean, there will be THE BLOOD OF CHILDREN RUNNING IN THE STREETS. I mean, just look at Alaska and Vermont, they are like the crime capitals of America!

What we need is more unconstitutional bans like Chicago has and DC had, I mean, they're like the safest places right?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Alaska and Vermont are mostly rural backwaters.
It feels so republican, teabaggy militia when people use obviously inappropriate comparisons to make their points. But I'm sure you are all good Democrats and vote that way as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. You'd know all about feelin teabaggy, now wouldn't you, Walk away?
You've got an apparently close relationship with the sensation, based off of your usual behavior on these boards. Must make you feel damn proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Vermont, tea-baggy? Seriously?
Try not to be stupid. Try hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
15. I openly carried a loaded .45 caliber pistol during my recent drive into the Zone and back
It's no big deal there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
16. What could go wrong? A sudden spike in Subaru sales...
...An inexplicable desire for winter sports...artisanal cheeses...large numbers of Zonies becoming fond of jam bands...a socialist elected to Congress...

All these terrible things occur in Vermont, which has permit-free concealed carry.

FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY, DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN TO YOU, ARIZONA!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GMBshootingclubM60 Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. been the law in Vermont for 200 years. No permit.
No restrictions for concealed carry. Safest state in the nation.

States bordering Vermont, NY and Assachusetts have crime and gun control.

Dr. Howard Dean, cardiologist, would be president today if it weren't for antigun nuts forcing him to swallow gun control in order to run in a national campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Vermont barely has a full time population and you are comparing...
it to NY and Massachusetts? Who is the real Assachusettes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cowman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Ah yes
and the name calling begins from the antis, gun control as an issue is dead, get over it, the SCOTUS is about to stick a fork in it.

We all know what a gun free paradise NJ is because of its restrictive gun laws, Oh wait, no its not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Bigotry on display. Thanks for your input.
Edited on Thu Mar-25-10 06:21 PM by PavePusher
P.S. About half a million people now know you are full of low-grade natural fertilizer. Please cease your public self-fornication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Of course they are- they're extremists
Reasonable regulation of the objects of their obsession is offensive to the pathology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Euromutt said...."If you can't legally possess the gun you can't carry it."
"Thus, persons prohibited from owning a firearm under federal (and possibly state) law, such as convicted felons, persons adjudicated "mentally deficient," convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors or subject to TROs/PPOs will not be able to legally carry, for the very simple reason they can't legally possess a firearm at all.

Kind of obvious when you think about it, isn't it?"

When has thought on this issue ever been prized by the antis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC